From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753399AbaIEW5n (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:57:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:63457 "EHLO mail-pd0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187AbaIEW5l (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:57:41 -0400 Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 07:57:32 +0900 From: Tejun Heo To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Arjan van de Ven , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Wu Zhangjin , Takashi Iwai , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Oleg Nesterov , hare@suse.com, Andrew Morton , Tetsuo Handa , Joseph Salisbury , Benjamin Poirier , Santosh Rastapur , Kay Sievers , One Thousand Gnomes , Tim Gardner , Pierre Fersing , Nagalakshmi Nandigama , Praveen Krishnamoorthy , Sreekanth Reddy , Abhijit Mahajan , Casey Leedom , Hariprasad S , MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com, Linux SCSI List , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/6] kthread: warn on kill signal if not OOM Message-ID: <20140905225732.GF15723@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1409899047-13045-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <20140905141241.GC10455@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140905164405.GA28964@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20140905174925.GA12991@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140905181003.GA29003@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20140905222956.GA15723@mtj.dyndns.org> <540A3CF4.5070508@linux.intel.com> <20140905225248.GC35667@core.coreip.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140905225248.GC35667@core.coreip.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 03:52:48PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Ahem... and they sure it works reliably with large storage arrays? With > SCSI doing probing asynchronously already? I believe this has been mentioned before too but, yes, SCSI device probing is asynchronous and parallelized but the registration of the discovered devices are fully serialized according to driver attach order. Storage devices are probed in parallel and attached in a fully deterministic order. That part has never changed. Thanks. -- tejun