From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751607AbaIFMzF (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2014 08:55:05 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:53267 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbaIFMy6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2014 08:54:58 -0400 Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:54:48 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Jason Cooper Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Marc Zyngier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20140906125448.GB32429@sirena.org.uk> References: <1406480224-24628-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org> <20140817165736.GD12769@titan.lakedaemon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140817165736.GD12769@titan.lakedaemon.net> X-Cookie: You have no real enemies. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic-v3: Only define gic_peek_irq() when building SMP X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:57:36PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 05:57:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > From: Mark Brown > > If building with CONFIG_SMP disbled (for example, with allnoconfig) then > > GCC complains that the static function gic_peek_irq() is defined but not > > used since the only reference is in the SMP initialisation code. Fix this > > by moving the function definition inside the ifdef. > Applied to irqchip/urgent with Mark's Ack. This also appears to have disappeared from -next and again the warning is back. --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUCwQYAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQTikH/38Jj+8ZbNTz+6TUopNUPfJU RO49e/L8u0aRPVhOBJCXKH2DW9HRn7Dk/r/aWg0WJC/FJp3b38URwlEegGPNuGxG 7UNF6AqlI98D3yKpOSbguA60KliTJdBBoUxEtB11wZJjRSWVFN/lhdl70TfPc8A+ lEy6p1rBOqxYJeSfduK5Qo7EMArMNbsPLXKwPNwEubS8cFZRu/kM6JqWfA37Wvma vEmX7jWFlP+MvM76BAaNXrNBi9/Zm9fDzFFD0rw7qVMUVDAdNOKvHaSgjePS2iPw MSU+YlxKCH3OO/ZiyAwYgOqMeYhWATVydGs9d9lucaEVPzWMdrwOl1CDEpdrfWc= =tMF6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD--