From: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: "zhichang.yuan" <zhichang.yuan@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>,
lauraa@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: Some questions about DEBUG_PAGEALLOC on ARMv8
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 11:55:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140908105530.GB4866@e103986-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140904094152.GB16169@arm.com>
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:41:52AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Zhichang,
>
> (cc'ing Steve Capper for the huge page stuff)
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:38:26PM +0100, zhichang.yuan wrote:
> > I am working to implement the DEBUG_PAGEALLOC on ARMv8.
>
> I assume that's the arm64 kernel.
>
> > After i investigated the DEBUG_PAGEALLOC implementation on x86 arch,
> > some questions are standing in the way to start coding.
> >
> > 1. How to handle the large page when DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is enabled In
> > ARMv8, the kernel direct memory page table entries will set the block
> > flag for better performance. When DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is configured, if
> > the size of freed page is not multiply of page block size, there is no
> > corresponding page table entry. In the old x86 kernel version, the
> > large page to be freed will be split into normal page size and build
> > the corresponding PTEs. And afterwards, someone done a patch to remove
> > the splitting process. It will make the code simpler and easily
> > stable.
>
> Initially, you could either map everything as pages or implement
> splitting of huge pages (if for example the huge page is at the pmd
> level, you allocate and populate a pte).
>
> > I prefer the current design in x86, what are your thoughts here?
>
> I haven't looked at it yet.
>
> > 2. Does ARMv8 support HIBERNATION?
>
> Not yet.
>
> > The HIBERNATION has some dependency on DEBUG_PAGEALLOC.
>
> Like in DEBUG_PAGEALLOC "depends on !HIBERNATION"?
>
> > 3. Is the hypothesis of DEBUG_PAGEALLOC always true?
>
> Which hypothesis?
>
> > From the x86 code, DEBUG_PAGEALLOC use the invalid page table entries
> > to catch the accesses to free pages. This mechanism is based on the
> > hypothesis that all the corresponding page table entries that are
> > corresponding to the free pages are cleared correctly. Supposed this
> > condition is always true, what we need to do is just to clear the
> > kernel linear mapping page entries, since those page tables are
> > fixable after initialization. DEBUG_PAGEALLOC on x86 seems to do like
> > that.
>
> I guess that's the ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC rather than just the
> simple DEBUG_PAGEALLOC which can be enabled on arm64 as well, you just
> get page poisoning rather than invalid mappings.
>
> It could be done on arm64 as well but you need to sort out huge page
> splitting or just map everything as pages when the option is enabled.
>
(cc'ing Laura Abbott for info...)
Hi,
There is support for splitting pmd's and pud's in the direct kernel
mapping in the following series from Laura Abbott:
"[PATCHv3 7/7] arm64: add better page protections to arm64"
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-August/280782.html
Perhaps some of the splitting logic there could be used by the
kernel_map_pages arm64 implementation for ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC?
Cheers,
--
Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-08 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-22 12:38 zhichang.yuan
2014-09-04 9:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-08 10:55 ` Steve Capper [this message]
2014-09-08 17:14 ` Laura Abbott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140908105530.GB4866@e103986-lin \
--to=steve.capper@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dsaxena@linaro.org \
--cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhichang.yuan@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®