From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754163AbaIKKTq (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 06:19:46 -0400 Received: from 251.110.2.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.2.110.251]:41888 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753549AbaIKKTo (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 06:19:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:19:30 +0100 From: One Thousand Gnomes To: Peter Hurley Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] tty: Always allow tcflow(TCOON) to unwedge terminal Message-ID: <20140911111930.7227abbf@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <5410E8A2.5030802@hurleysoftware.com> References: <1410384499-4982-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <20140911000343.GA5328@kroah.com> <5410E8A2.5030802@hurleysoftware.com> Organization: Intel Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It's not common knowledge (and its certainly counterintuitive) that > turning off output when output is already turned off (ie., tcflow(TCOOFF)) > is the required trickery to unwedge a terminal. > > Unwedging directly seems the straightforward approach. Putting the off/on in the man page might be safer still ?