From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Seunghun Lee <waydi1@gmail.com>
Cc: rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@gmail.com,
jlayton@poochiereds.net, bfields@fieldses.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: move getname() from callers to do_mount()
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:12:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140914181259.GQ7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410700510-15408-1-git-send-email-waydi1@gmail.com>
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:15:10PM +0900, Seunghun Lee wrote:
> It would make more sense to pass char __user * instead of
> char * in callers of do_mount() and do getname() inside do_mount().
>
> Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Seunghun Lee <waydi1@gmail.com>
Applied with one modification: this getname/kern_path/putname is equivalent to
user_path(dir_name, &path) and do_mount() becomes simpler if we use that
instead of not-quite-opencoding it.
Beginning of do_mount() becomes simply
/* Discard magic */
if ((flags & MS_MGC_MSK) == MS_MGC_VAL)
flags &= ~MS_MGC_MSK;
/* Basic sanity checks */
if (data_page)
((char *)data_page)[PAGE_SIZE - 1] = 0;
/* ... and get the mountpoint */
retval = user_path(dir_name, &path);
if (retval)
return retval;
that way, and there's no struct filename * to discard on exit; getname and
putname are done inside user_path().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-14 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-12 15:53 [PATCH] vfs: remove redundant sanity check in do_mount Seunghun Lee
2014-09-12 16:28 ` Al Viro
2014-09-13 4:11 ` Seunghun Lee
2014-09-14 13:15 ` [PATCH] vfs: move getname() from callers to do_mount() Seunghun Lee
2014-09-14 13:36 ` Jeff Layton
2014-09-14 18:12 ` Al Viro [this message]
[not found] ` <CA+LGb9aaMpiotK7-NUv4hKcJHbuWQE=DC=p=90ZguWqn44qcTQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-09-15 5:18 ` Al Viro
2014-09-15 5:26 ` Seunghun Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140914181259.GQ7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=waydi1@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome