From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753298AbaIOCbJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:31:09 -0400
Received: from LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.151]:51670 "EHLO
	lgemrelse7q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753153AbaIOCbI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:31:08 -0400
X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.220.159
X-Original-MAILFROM: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:31:06 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
        Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
        Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
        Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
        Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@samsung.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>, t.stanislaws@samsung.com,
        Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] mm/page_alloc: fix incorrect isolation
 behavior by rechecking migratetype
Message-ID: <20140915023106.GD2676@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
References: <1409040498-10148-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
 <1409040498-10148-2-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
 <540D6961.8060209@suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <540D6961.8060209@suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:31:29AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 08/26/2014 10:08 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 
> >diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >index f86023b..51e0d13 100644
> >--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> >+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >@@ -740,9 +740,15 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone,
> >  	if (nr_scanned)
> >  		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_PAGES_SCANNED, -nr_scanned);
> >
> >+	if (unlikely(has_isolate_pageblock(zone))) {
> >+		migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
> >+		if (is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))
> >+			goto skip_counting;
> >+	}
> >+	__mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1 << order, migratetype);
> >+
> >+skip_counting:
> 
> Here, wouldn't a simple 'else __mod_zone_freepage_state...' look
> better than goto + label? (same for the following 2 patches). Or
> does that generate worse code?

To remove goto label, we need two __mod_zone_freepage_state() like
as below. On my system, it doesn't generate worse code, but, I am not
sure that this is true if more logic would be added. I think that
goto + label is better.

+	if (unlikely(has_isolate_pageblock(zone))) {
+		migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
+               if (!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))
+                       __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1 << order, migratetype);
+       } else {
+               __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1 << order, migratetype);
        }

Anyway, What do you think which one is better, either v2 or v3? Still, v3? :)

Thanks.