From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752760AbaIXOuP (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:50:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1799 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751193AbaIXOuN (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:50:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:59:07 +0100 From: Alexander Gordeev To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 5/6] AHCI: Optimize single IRQ interrupt processing Message-ID: <20140924145906.GC2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20140923205710.GB17332@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140924104213.GA2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20140924130444.GA16555@htj.dyndns.org> <20140924140844.GB2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20140924143913.GH16555@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140924143913.GH16555@htj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:39:13AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Would it be possible for you compare threaded vs. unthreaded under > relatively heavy load? I will try, although not quite soon. In the meantime I could fix and resend patches 1,2,3 and 6 as they are not related to this topic. Makes sense? > -- > tejun -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev@redhat.com