mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] init: Add strictinit to disable init= fallbacks
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:23:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140926142315.49215fc5@as> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <138a894f22366da4173c8a4f2bfb0e670c66dbec.1411758752.git.luto@amacapital.net>

On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:13:57 -0700
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:

> If a user puts init=/whatever on the command line and /whatever
> can't be run, then the kernel will try a few default options before
> giving up.  If init=/whatever came from a bootloader prompt, then
> this probably makes sense.  On the other hand, if it comes from a
> script (e.g. a tool like virtme or perhaps a future kselftest
> script), then the fallbacks are likely to exist, but they'll do the
> wrong thing.  For example, they might unexpectedly invoke systemd.
> 
> This adds a new option called strictinit.  If init= and strictinit
> are both set, and the init= binary is not executable, then the
> kernel will panic immediately.  If strictinit is set but init= is
> not set, then strictinit will have no effect, because the only real
> alternative would be to panic regardless of the contents of the root
> fs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> ---
>  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |  8 ++++++++
>  init/main.c                         | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 10d51c2f10d7..1576273edce6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -3236,6 +3236,14 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
>  	stifb=		[HW]
>  			Format: bpp:<bpp1>[:<bpp2>[:<bpp3>...]]
>  
> +	strictinit	[KNL,BOOT]
> +			Normally, if the kernel can't find the init binary
> +			specified by rdinit= and/or init=, then it will
> +			try several fallbacks.  If strictinit is set
> +			and the value specified by init= does not work,
> +			then the kernel will panic instead.
> +			This option makes no sense if init= is not specified.
> +
>  	sunrpc.min_resvport=
>  	sunrpc.max_resvport=
>  			[NFS,SUNRPC]
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index bb1aed928f21..2ae0f2776155 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ static char *initcall_command_line;
>  
>  static char *execute_command;
>  static char *ramdisk_execute_command;
> +static bool strictinit;
>  
>  /*
>   * Used to generate warnings if static_key manipulation functions are used
> @@ -347,6 +348,13 @@ static int __init rdinit_setup(char *str)
>  }
>  __setup("rdinit=", rdinit_setup);
>  
> +static int __init strictinit_setup(char *str)
> +{
> +	strictinit = true;
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("strictinit", strictinit_setup);
> +
>  #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
>  static const unsigned int setup_max_cpus = NR_CPUS;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
> @@ -960,8 +968,12 @@ static int __ref kernel_init(void *unused)
>  		ret = run_init_process(execute_command);
>  		if (!ret)
>  			return 0;
> -		pr_err("Failed to execute %s (error %d).  Attempting defaults...\n",
> -			execute_command, ret);
> +		if (strictinit)
> +			panic("Requested init %s failed (error %d) and strictinit was set.",
> +			      execute_command, ret);
> +		else
> +			pr_err("Failed to execute %s (error %d).  Attempting defaults...\n",
> +			       execute_command, ret);
>  	}
>  	if (!try_to_run_init_process("/sbin/init") ||
>  	    !try_to_run_init_process("/etc/init") ||

Can't you just make it use "init=foo,strict" instead?

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-26 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-26 19:13 Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-26 19:23 ` Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2014-09-26 19:30   ` Rob Landley
2014-09-26 19:32     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-26 19:31   ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140926142315.49215fc5@as \
    --to=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=shuah.kh@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome