mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
To: Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@gmail.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: add driver for Ricoh RN5T618 watchdog
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:18:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140929191844.GT26868@spo001.leaseweb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140929165052.GA2085@gmail.com>

Hi Beniamino,

> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:24:11PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure why a) this patch was sent to me in the first place and
> > > > b) why anyone would think this should go in through MFD?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi Lee,
> > > 
> > > from a previous mail [1] I (wrongly) assumed that this was going
> > > through the MFD tree. If this is not the case, Wim, can you pick the
> > > patch?
> > > 
> > > Beniamino
> > > 
> > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/4/124
> > 
> > Okay, I see what's happened.
> > 
> > So actually if there are interdependencies between this and the other
> > patches in the set, which I think there are, then you should have kept
> > this in the set with the others.  Sending as an independent patch is
> > not the correct thing to do.
> > 
> > Can you resend this, as a patch-set with all of the Acks you have
> > acquired please.  I will then take the set as a whole.
> 
> The original series had 4 patches:
> 
> - MFD core support
> - regulator driver
> - watchdog driver
> - dts documentation
> 
> As explained in the submission comment, all patches except watchdog
> one have already been applied (1 and 4 to MFD tree, 2 to
> regulator). Only the watchdog support is missing and it doesn't have
> compilation dependencies to other patches (the watchdog driver can't
> be enabled without the MFD core support).
> 
> Do you want me to resend the entire patchset or should this go in
> through watchdog?

I'll add it to the watchdog tree then.

Kind regads,
Wim.


      reply	other threads:[~2014-09-29 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-28 22:39 Beniamino Galvani
2014-09-29  6:34 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2014-09-29  7:58   ` Lee Jones
2014-09-29 10:51     ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-09-29 12:24       ` Lee Jones
2014-09-29 16:50         ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-09-29 19:18           ` Wim Van Sebroeck [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140929191844.GT26868@spo001.leaseweb.com \
    --to=wim@iguana.be \
    --cc=b.galvani@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®