From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751344AbaJAOAJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:00:09 -0400 Received: from foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com ([217.140.108.86]:40125 "EHLO foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751142AbaJAOAH (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:00:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 14:59:58 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Andrew Pinski Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "pinskia@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/24] ARM64: Add vdso for ILP32 and use it for the signal return Message-ID: <20141001135957.GM12702@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1409779158-30963-1-git-send-email-apinski@cavium.com> <1409779158-30963-19-git-send-email-apinski@cavium.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1409779158-30963-19-git-send-email-apinski@cavium.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:19:12PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote: > This patch adds the VDSO for ILP32. We need to use a different > VDSO than LP64 since ILP32 uses ELF32 while LP64 uses ELF64. > > After this patch, signal handling works mostly. In that signals > go through their action and then returned correctly. As you say "mostly", is there anything that does not work? -- Catalin