mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: David Daney <david.s.daney@gmail.com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] MIPS: Allow FPU emulator to use non-stack area.
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 07:11:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141007111102.GH23797@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54337127.40806@gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 09:50:47PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> >>the out-of-line execution trick, but do it somewhere other than in
> >>stack memory.
> >How do you answer Andy Lutomirski's question about what happens when a
> >signal handler interrupts execution while the program counter is
> >pointing at this "out-of-line execution" trampoline? This seems like a
> >show-stopper for using anything other than the stack.
> It would be nice to support, but not doing so would not be a
> regression from current behavior.

It's not just "nice" to support, it's mandatory. Otherwise you will
execute essentially *random instructions* in this case, providing a
very nice attack vector that can almost certainly be elevated to
arbitrary code execution via timing of signals during floating point
code.

The current behavior in regards to this is correct: because you have a
*stack*, each trampoline is pushed onto the stack in its own context,
and popped when it's no longer needed. You can have arbitrarily many
such trampolines up to the stack size. Note that each nested signal
handler already requires sizeof(ucontext_t) in stack space, so these
trampolines are a negligible additional cost without major effects on
the number of signal handlers you can nest without overflowing the
stack.

> >>One way of doing this is to have the kernel magically generate
> >>thread local memory regions.
> >>
> >>Another option is to have userspace manage the out-of-line execution areas.
> >>
> >>As is often the case, each approach has different pluses and minuses.
> >Having the kernel magically do it would be better, but I'm doubtful
> >that solution works anyway due to the above signal handler/nesting
> >issue.
> 
> So the perfect is the enemy of the good?  No non-executable stack
> for you, MIPS.

No, regressions that make the situation worse than executable-stack
are not "good" to begin with, even if it weren't for the other design
issues and dumping everything on userspace for the sake of being lazy
in the kernel.

Rich

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-07 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-06 20:23 David Daney
2014-10-06 20:54 ` Rich Felker
2014-10-06 21:18   ` David Daney
2014-10-06 21:31     ` Rich Felker
2014-10-06 21:45       ` David Daney
2014-10-06 21:58         ` Rich Felker
2014-10-06 22:17           ` David Daney
2014-10-06 23:08             ` Rich Felker
2014-10-06 23:38           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-06 23:48             ` David Daney
2014-10-06 23:54               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-07  0:05               ` Rich Felker
2014-10-07  0:11                 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-10-07  0:21                   ` Rich Felker
2014-10-07  0:28                     ` Andrew Pinski
2014-10-07  0:29                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-07  0:32                         ` David Daney
2014-10-07  0:33                 ` David Daney
2014-10-07  0:48                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-07  0:49                   ` Rich Felker
2014-10-07  4:50                     ` David Daney
2014-10-07  9:13                       ` Matthew Fortune
2014-10-07 10:52                         ` James Hogan
2014-10-07 11:19                         ` Rich Felker
2014-10-07 16:04                         ` David Daney
2014-10-07 18:32                         ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-07 18:43                           ` David Daney
2014-10-07 19:13                             ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-07 18:44                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-07 18:50                             ` David Daney
2014-10-07 19:09                             ` Rich Felker
2014-10-07 19:16                               ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-07 19:21                                 ` Rich Felker
2014-10-07 19:27                                   ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-07 19:28                                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-07 20:03                                     ` David Daney
2014-10-08  0:22                                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-07 19:40                             ` Matthew Fortune
2014-10-07 11:11                       ` Rich Felker [this message]
2014-10-07 16:08                         ` David Daney
2014-10-07 18:16                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-07 23:20     ` Ralf Baechle
2014-10-07 23:59       ` David Daney
2014-10-08  0:18         ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-10-08  2:37           ` Rich Felker
2014-10-08 10:31         ` Paul Burton
2014-10-07  1:02 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2014-10-07  1:38   ` Rich Felker
2014-10-07  4:32   ` David Daney
2014-10-07 11:53     ` James Hogan
2014-10-07 12:22       ` James Hogan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141007111102.GH23797@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
    --to=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
    --cc=david.s.daney@gmail.com \
    --cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®