From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756765AbaJHOZu (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 10:25:50 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:40769 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755428AbaJHOZr (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 10:25:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:25:11 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Doug Anderson , Chanwoo Choi , Olof Johansson , Chris Zhong , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Abhilash Kesavan , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20141008142511.GA4609@sirena.org.uk> References: <1412775847-15213-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1412775847-15213-2-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NRg0qHkDgHfQnopc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1412775847-15213-2-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> X-Cookie: Everything you know is wrong! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] regulator: of: Add regulator-initial-mode parse support X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --NRg0qHkDgHfQnopc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:44:03PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > But currently there isn't a way to do the same with DeviceTrees. Argubly > the operating modes are Linux-specific so that information should not be > in the DT which should be used to only describe hardware. But regulators > having different operating modes is also a hardware property since many > PMICs have support to set different modes for their regulators. That doesn't mean that the definition of those modes is something we can sensibly provide in generic code, especially in a completely undocumented fashion (perhaps you've done that later in the patch series but bisection also applies to reviewability). --NRg0qHkDgHfQnopc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUNUlGAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQgHkIAIY527r8xpJbskYfmMvb5P66 GvpG+7Uc5BKFOkdpceg2Mf+oO5TZR1ilPsAOEQYGhOHHLhMeKZi3pwgx9gLCiR7g oB+dXKw0J5QcDhN7jGLFCUDSWDzD7mgqhGmP3zeO2pAbKqaaACNBjEAKrWhp4kgz Ra9gqvOVZjhV8LoVZThjpxoxucfwue3ywSJZLCtQ40HMJRnxyNO8KKqEwc7MJbqI lJmZNeFTzGbAtc+DXi1VmR4+MlSkBQw564jgJ/b3NEWrT/o1/lfFVJrjHJj1xV+r CZup4CpdynrzaKYYQN9RFjosM4e1XKcVxyXBIF1X3qao8MxE1uYU+jXGcRr2R5U= =roPf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NRg0qHkDgHfQnopc--