From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clean up scheduling in trace_wakeup_test_thread()
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:10:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141009011057.316310917@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141009011010.446507073@goodmis.org>
[-- Attachment #1: 0002-tracing-Clean-up-scheduling-in-trace_wakeup_test_thr.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3537 bytes --]
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Peter's new debugging tool triggers when tasks exit with !TASK_RUNNING.
The code in trace_wakeup_test_thread() also has a single schedule() call
that should be encompassed by a loop.
This cleans up the code a little to make it a bit more robust and
also makes the return exit properly with TASK_RUNNING.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/20141008135216.76142204@gandalf.local.home
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
index 5ef60499dc8e..593f52b73551 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
@@ -1025,6 +1025,12 @@ trace_selftest_startup_nop(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER
+
+struct wakeup_test_data {
+ struct completion is_ready;
+ int go;
+};
+
static int trace_wakeup_test_thread(void *data)
{
/* Make this a -deadline thread */
@@ -1034,51 +1040,56 @@ static int trace_wakeup_test_thread(void *data)
.sched_deadline = 10000000ULL,
.sched_period = 10000000ULL
};
- struct completion *x = data;
+ struct wakeup_test_data *x = data;
sched_setattr(current, &attr);
/* Make it know we have a new prio */
- complete(x);
+ complete(&x->is_ready);
/* now go to sleep and let the test wake us up */
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule();
+ while (!x->go) {
+ schedule();
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ }
- complete(x);
+ complete(&x->is_ready);
+
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
/* we are awake, now wait to disappear */
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
- /*
- * This will likely be the system top priority
- * task, do short sleeps to let others run.
- */
- msleep(100);
+ schedule();
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
}
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+
return 0;
}
-
int
trace_selftest_startup_wakeup(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr)
{
unsigned long save_max = tr->max_latency;
struct task_struct *p;
- struct completion is_ready;
+ struct wakeup_test_data data;
unsigned long count;
int ret;
- init_completion(&is_ready);
+ memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
+
+ init_completion(&data.is_ready);
/* create a -deadline thread */
- p = kthread_run(trace_wakeup_test_thread, &is_ready, "ftrace-test");
+ p = kthread_run(trace_wakeup_test_thread, &data, "ftrace-test");
if (IS_ERR(p)) {
printk(KERN_CONT "Failed to create ftrace wakeup test thread ");
return -1;
}
/* make sure the thread is running at -deadline policy */
- wait_for_completion(&is_ready);
+ wait_for_completion(&data.is_ready);
/* start the tracing */
ret = tracer_init(trace, tr);
@@ -1099,18 +1110,20 @@ trace_selftest_startup_wakeup(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr)
msleep(100);
}
- init_completion(&is_ready);
+ init_completion(&data.is_ready);
+
+ data.go = 1;
+ /* memory barrier is in the wake_up_process() */
wake_up_process(p);
/* Wait for the task to wake up */
- wait_for_completion(&is_ready);
+ wait_for_completion(&data.is_ready);
/* stop the tracing. */
tracing_stop();
/* check both trace buffers */
ret = trace_test_buffer(&tr->trace_buffer, NULL);
- printk("ret = %d\n", ret);
if (!ret)
ret = trace_test_buffer(&tr->max_buffer, &count);
--
2.0.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-09 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-09 1:10 [for-next][PATCH 0/2] tracing: Minor fixes to the start up tests Steven Rostedt
2014-10-09 1:10 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/2] tracing: Robustify wait loop Steven Rostedt
2014-10-09 1:10 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-10-09 9:39 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clean up scheduling in trace_wakeup_test_thread() Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141009011057.316310917@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome