mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clean up scheduling in trace_wakeup_test_thread()
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:10:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141009011057.316310917@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141009011010.446507073@goodmis.org>

[-- Attachment #1: 0002-tracing-Clean-up-scheduling-in-trace_wakeup_test_thr.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3537 bytes --]

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Peter's new debugging tool triggers when tasks exit with !TASK_RUNNING.
The code in trace_wakeup_test_thread() also has a single schedule() call
that should be encompassed by a loop.

This cleans up the code a little to make it a bit more robust and
also makes the return exit properly with TASK_RUNNING.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/20141008135216.76142204@gandalf.local.home

Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
index 5ef60499dc8e..593f52b73551 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
@@ -1025,6 +1025,12 @@ trace_selftest_startup_nop(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER
+
+struct wakeup_test_data {
+	struct completion	is_ready;
+	int			go;
+};
+
 static int trace_wakeup_test_thread(void *data)
 {
 	/* Make this a -deadline thread */
@@ -1034,51 +1040,56 @@ static int trace_wakeup_test_thread(void *data)
 		.sched_deadline = 10000000ULL,
 		.sched_period = 10000000ULL
 	};
-	struct completion *x = data;
+	struct wakeup_test_data *x = data;
 
 	sched_setattr(current, &attr);
 
 	/* Make it know we have a new prio */
-	complete(x);
+	complete(&x->is_ready);
 
 	/* now go to sleep and let the test wake us up */
 	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-	schedule();
+	while (!x->go) {
+		schedule();
+		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+	}
 
-	complete(x);
+	complete(&x->is_ready);
+
+	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 
 	/* we are awake, now wait to disappear */
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
-		/*
-		 * This will likely be the system top priority
-		 * task, do short sleeps to let others run.
-		 */
-		msleep(100);
+		schedule();
+		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 	}
 
+	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+
 	return 0;
 }
-
 int
 trace_selftest_startup_wakeup(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr)
 {
 	unsigned long save_max = tr->max_latency;
 	struct task_struct *p;
-	struct completion is_ready;
+	struct wakeup_test_data data;
 	unsigned long count;
 	int ret;
 
-	init_completion(&is_ready);
+	memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
+
+	init_completion(&data.is_ready);
 
 	/* create a -deadline thread */
-	p = kthread_run(trace_wakeup_test_thread, &is_ready, "ftrace-test");
+	p = kthread_run(trace_wakeup_test_thread, &data, "ftrace-test");
 	if (IS_ERR(p)) {
 		printk(KERN_CONT "Failed to create ftrace wakeup test thread ");
 		return -1;
 	}
 
 	/* make sure the thread is running at -deadline policy */
-	wait_for_completion(&is_ready);
+	wait_for_completion(&data.is_ready);
 
 	/* start the tracing */
 	ret = tracer_init(trace, tr);
@@ -1099,18 +1110,20 @@ trace_selftest_startup_wakeup(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr)
 		msleep(100);
 	}
 
-	init_completion(&is_ready);
+	init_completion(&data.is_ready);
+
+	data.go = 1;
+	/* memory barrier is in the wake_up_process() */
 
 	wake_up_process(p);
 
 	/* Wait for the task to wake up */
-	wait_for_completion(&is_ready);
+	wait_for_completion(&data.is_ready);
 
 	/* stop the tracing. */
 	tracing_stop();
 	/* check both trace buffers */
 	ret = trace_test_buffer(&tr->trace_buffer, NULL);
-	printk("ret = %d\n", ret);
 	if (!ret)
 		ret = trace_test_buffer(&tr->max_buffer, &count);
 
-- 
2.0.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-09  1:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-09  1:10 [for-next][PATCH 0/2] tracing: Minor fixes to the start up tests Steven Rostedt
2014-10-09  1:10 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/2] tracing: Robustify wait loop Steven Rostedt
2014-10-09  1:10 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-10-09  9:39   ` [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clean up scheduling in trace_wakeup_test_thread() Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141009011057.316310917@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome