From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] gpio / ACPI: Add support for _DSD device properties
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:44:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141014134403.66480C408A6@trevor.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1651636.CsIdshL7Av@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 02:15:18 +0200
, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
wrote:
> From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
>
> With release of ACPI 5.1 and _DSD method we can finally name GPIOs (and
> other things as well) returned by _CRS. Previously we were only able to
> use integer index to find the corresponding GPIO, which is pretty error
> prone if the order changes.
>
> With _DSD we can now query GPIOs using name instead of an integer index,
> like the below example shows:
>
> // Bluetooth device with reset and shutdown GPIOs
> Device (BTH)
> {
> Name (_HID, ...)
>
> Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate ()
> {
> GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionInputOnly,
> "\\_SB.GPO0", 0, ResourceConsumer) {15}
> GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionInputOnly,
> "\\_SB.GPO0", 0, ResourceConsumer) {27, 31}
> })
>
> Name (_DSD, Package ()
> {
> ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> Package ()
> {
> Package () {"reset-gpio", Package() {^BTH, 1, 1, 0 }},
> Package () {"shutdown-gpio", Package() {^BTH, 0, 0, 0 }},
> }
> })
> }
>
> The format of the supported GPIO property is:
>
> Package () { "name", Package () { ref, index, pin, active_low }}
>
> ref - The device that has _CRS containing GpioIo()/GpioInt() resources,
> typically this is the device itself (BTH in our case).
> index - Index of the GpioIo()/GpioInt() resource in _CRS starting from zero.
> pin - Pin in the GpioIo()/GpioInt() resource. Typically this is zero.
> active_low - If 1 the GPIO is marked as active_low.
>
> Since ACPI GpioIo() resource does not have field saying whether it is
> active low or high, the "active_low" argument can be used here. Setting
> it to 1 marks the GPIO as active low.
>
> In our Bluetooth example the "reset-gpio" refers to the second GpioIo()
> resource, second pin in that resource with the GPIO number of 31.
>
> This patch implements necessary support to gpiolib for extracting GPIOs
> using _DSD device properties.
Patch looks good, but please put the above description into
/Documentation until we've got a better place to document extra bindings.
g.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 30 ++++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h | 7 ++--
> 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> index 687476f..b14c045 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> @@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ void acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> struct acpi_gpio_lookup {
> struct acpi_gpio_info info;
> int index;
> + int pin_index;
> struct gpio_desc *desc;
> int n;
> };
> @@ -306,13 +307,24 @@ static int acpi_find_gpio(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
>
> if (lookup->n++ == lookup->index && !lookup->desc) {
> const struct acpi_resource_gpio *agpio = &ares->data.gpio;
> + int pin_index = lookup->pin_index;
> +
> + if (pin_index >= agpio->pin_table_length)
> + return 1;
>
> lookup->desc = acpi_get_gpiod(agpio->resource_source.string_ptr,
> - agpio->pin_table[0]);
> + agpio->pin_table[pin_index]);
> lookup->info.gpioint =
> agpio->connection_type == ACPI_RESOURCE_GPIO_TYPE_INT;
> - lookup->info.active_low =
> - agpio->polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW;
> +
> + /*
> + * ActiveLow is only specified for GpioInt resource. If
> + * GpioIo is used then the only way to set the flag is
> + * to use _DSD "gpios" property.
> + */
> + if (lookup->info.gpioint)
> + lookup->info.active_low =
> + agpio->polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW;
> }
>
> return 1;
> @@ -320,40 +332,75 @@ static int acpi_find_gpio(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
>
> /**
> * acpi_get_gpiod_by_index() - get a GPIO descriptor from device resources
> - * @dev: pointer to a device to get GPIO from
> + * @adev: pointer to a ACPI device to get GPIO from
> + * @propname: Property name of the GPIO (optional)
> * @index: index of GpioIo/GpioInt resource (starting from %0)
> * @info: info pointer to fill in (optional)
> *
> - * Function goes through ACPI resources for @dev and based on @index looks
> + * Function goes through ACPI resources for @adev and based on @index looks
> * up a GpioIo/GpioInt resource, translates it to the Linux GPIO descriptor,
> * and returns it. @index matches GpioIo/GpioInt resources only so if there
> * are total %3 GPIO resources, the index goes from %0 to %2.
> *
> + * If @propname is specified the GPIO is looked using device property. In
> + * that case @index is used to select the GPIO entry in the property value
> + * (in case of multiple).
> + *
> * If the GPIO cannot be translated or there is an error an ERR_PTR is
> * returned.
> *
> * Note: if the GPIO resource has multiple entries in the pin list, this
> * function only returns the first.
> */
> -struct gpio_desc *acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct device *dev, int index,
> +struct gpio_desc *acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct acpi_device *adev,
> + const char *propname, int index,
> struct acpi_gpio_info *info)
> {
> struct acpi_gpio_lookup lookup;
> struct list_head resource_list;
> - struct acpi_device *adev;
> - acpi_handle handle;
> + bool active_low = false;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!dev)
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> -
> - handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> - if (!handle || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev))
> + if (!adev)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
> memset(&lookup, 0, sizeof(lookup));
> lookup.index = index;
>
> + if (propname) {
> + struct acpi_reference_args args;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "GPIO: looking up %s\n", propname);
> +
> + memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));
> + ret = acpi_dev_get_property_reference(adev, propname, NULL,
> + index, &args);
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + /*
> + * The property was found and resolved so need to
> + * lookup the GPIO based on returned args instead.
> + */
> + adev = args.adev;
> + if (args.nargs >= 2) {
> + lookup.index = args.args[0];
> + lookup.pin_index = args.args[1];
> + /*
> + * 3rd argument, if present is used to
> + * specify active_low.
> + */
> + if (args.nargs >= 3)
> + active_low = !!args.args[2];
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "GPIO: _DSD returned %s %zd %llu %llu %llu\n",
> + dev_name(&adev->dev), args.nargs,
> + args.args[0], args.args[1], args.args[2]);
> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "GPIO: looking up %d in _CRS\n", index);
> + }
> +
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
> ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list, acpi_find_gpio,
> &lookup);
> @@ -362,8 +409,11 @@ struct gpio_desc *acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct device *dev, int index,
>
> acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
>
> - if (lookup.desc && info)
> + if (lookup.desc && info) {
> *info = lookup.info;
> + if (active_low)
> + info->active_low = active_low;
> + }
>
> return lookup.desc ? lookup.desc : ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index c68d037..4c86601 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -1487,14 +1487,36 @@ static struct gpio_desc *acpi_find_gpio(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
> unsigned int idx,
> enum gpio_lookup_flags *flags)
> {
> + static const char * const suffixes[] = { "gpios", "gpio" };
> + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> struct acpi_gpio_info info;
> struct gpio_desc *desc;
> + char propname[32];
> + int i;
>
> - desc = acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(dev, idx, &info);
> - if (IS_ERR(desc))
> - return desc;
> + /* Try first from _DSD */
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(suffixes); i++) {
> + if (con_id && strcmp(con_id, "gpios")) {
> + snprintf(propname, sizeof(propname), "%s-%s",
> + con_id, suffixes[i]);
> + } else {
> + snprintf(propname, sizeof(propname), "%s",
> + suffixes[i]);
> + }
> +
> + desc = acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(adev, propname, 0, &info);
> + if (!IS_ERR(desc) || (PTR_ERR(desc) == -EPROBE_DEFER))
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* Then from plain _CRS GPIOs */
> + if (IS_ERR(desc)) {
> + desc = acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(adev, NULL, idx, &info);
> + if (IS_ERR(desc))
> + return desc;
> + }
>
> - if (info.gpioint && info.active_low)
> + if (info.active_low)
> *flags |= GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
>
> return desc;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
> index 9db2b6a..e3a5211 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,8 @@ void acpi_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip);
> void acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(struct gpio_chip *chip);
> void acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts(struct gpio_chip *chip);
>
> -struct gpio_desc *acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct device *dev, int index,
> +struct gpio_desc *acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct acpi_device *adev,
> + const char *propname, int index,
> struct acpi_gpio_info *info);
> #else
> static inline void acpi_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip) { }
> @@ -47,8 +48,8 @@ static inline void
> acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts(struct gpio_chip *chip) { }
>
> static inline struct gpio_desc *
> -acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct device *dev, int index,
> - struct acpi_gpio_info *info)
> +acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *propname,
> + int index, struct acpi_gpio_info *info)
> {
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
> }
> --
> 1.9.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-14 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-07 0:10 [PATCH v4 00/13] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 0:12 ` [PATCH 01/13] ACPI: Add support for device specific properties Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-13 12:47 ` Grant Likely
2014-10-07 0:12 ` [PATCH 02/13] Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 0:13 ` [PATCH 03/13] ACPI: Allow drivers to match using Device Tree compatible property Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-14 13:38 ` Grant Likely
2014-10-07 0:14 ` [PATCH 04/13] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-13 12:41 ` Grant Likely
2014-10-14 9:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-07 0:14 ` [PATCH 05/13] misc: at25: Make use of device property API Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 9:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-10-07 9:32 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-07 0:15 ` [PATCH 06/13] gpio / ACPI: Add support for _DSD device properties Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-14 13:44 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2014-10-15 8:46 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-07 0:15 ` [PATCH 07/13] gpio: sch: Consolidate core and resume banks Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 0:16 ` [PATCH 08/13] leds: leds-gpio: Add support for GPIO descriptors Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 0:16 ` [PATCH 09/12] input: gpio_keys_polled - " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 17:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-07 0:17 ` [PATCH 10/13] Driver core: Child node properties for devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 0:18 ` [PATCH 11/13] gpio: Support for unified device properties interface Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 10:22 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-07 10:40 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-07 10:52 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-08 0:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-08 2:55 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-08 14:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 0:18 ` [PATCH 12/13] leds: leds-gpio: Make use of device property API Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-08 14:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-08 17:47 ` Bryan Wu
2014-10-08 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 0:19 ` [PATCH 13/13] input: gpio_keys_polled - " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 17:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-07 0:39 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 2:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-10-15 13:04 ` David Woodhouse
2014-10-15 13:15 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-15 13:28 ` David Woodhouse
2014-10-15 13:42 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-15 14:08 ` David Woodhouse
2014-10-15 14:46 ` Darren Hart
2014-10-15 15:11 ` David Woodhouse
2014-10-15 15:17 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-15 15:43 ` Darren Hart
2014-10-16 10:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-16 14:55 ` David Woodhouse
2014-10-18 8:37 ` Grant Likely
2014-10-18 8:39 ` Grant Likely
2014-10-18 8:35 ` Grant Likely
2014-10-21 21:50 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties? support Darren Hart
2015-01-14 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support David Woodhouse
2015-01-15 9:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 12:01 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 12:03 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] ACPI: Add support for device specific properties Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 12:04 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-20 0:07 ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 12:05 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] ACPI: Allow drivers to match using Device Tree compatible property Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-20 14:05 ` Grant Likely
2014-10-20 22:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] misc: at25: Make use of device property API Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 12:09 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] gpio / ACPI: Add support for _DSD device properties Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 12:10 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] gpio: sch: Consolidate core and resume banks Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 12:11 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] leds: leds-gpio: Add support for GPIO descriptors Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-28 15:26 ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-28 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-29 8:53 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-30 15:40 ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-30 16:15 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-31 9:41 ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-31 9:55 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-30 15:34 ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-17 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] input: gpio_keys_polled - " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 12:14 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-18 9:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-19 23:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-20 14:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-18 14:55 ` Grant Likely
2014-10-19 23:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-20 14:18 ` Grant Likely
2014-10-20 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-20 14:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-20 14:55 ` Grant Likely
2014-10-20 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-19 22:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-10-19 23:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-20 0:15 ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 12:16 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] gpio: Support for unified device properties interface Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 18:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-18 9:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-19 23:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-20 14:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-20 6:12 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-20 14:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-17 12:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] leds: leds-gpio: Make use of device property API Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 12:18 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] input: gpio_keys_polled - " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-17 15:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-10-17 19:23 ` Darren Hart
2014-10-17 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-19 22:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-10-17 18:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-17 22:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-18 8:49 ` Grant Likely
2014-10-19 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141014134403.66480C408A6@trevor.secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cooloney@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®