From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751610AbaJOTuC (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:50:02 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:36258 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750792AbaJOTuA (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:50:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:50:00 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Joe Perches Cc: Andy Whitcroft , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] checkpatch: Add error on use of attribute((weak)) or __weak Message-Id: <20141015125000.44353284288395e216659953@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1413402348.7484.8.camel@perches.com> References: <4391d882bb26278110d07b9a5e23ec44f5f8328a.1413400022.git.joe@perches.com> <20141015124225.01a4cad19c4f3a198efc996e@linux-foundation.org> <1413402348.7484.8.camel@perches.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:45:48 -0700 Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 12:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:32:08 -0700 Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > Using weak can have unintended link defects. > > > Emit an error on its use. > > > > Well, we don't want a warning about use of __weak in function > > definitions. Only in declarations. > > Why is that? Because the problem we're trying to detect is when __weak is used on a declaration. This is OK: foo.h: extern int foo(void); foo.c: int __weak foo(void) { ... } But this is not OK: foo.h: extern __weak int foo(void); foo.c: int __weak foo(void) { ... }