From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753901AbaJWIpj (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 04:45:39 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:51497 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753677AbaJWIpf (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 04:45:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 01:45:30 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , Meelis Roos , David Miller , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fix blk-mq for SPI hosts Message-ID: <20141023084530.GB20233@infradead.org> References: <1413731638-28305-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1413731638-28305-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ping? On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 05:13:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Fix the assumption that we can treat all blk-mq requests as tagged. For > traditional SCSI that's wrong, as being tagged has a very explicit meaning > on the wire. > > This is a little bit different from the version Meelis tested earlier, but > the concept is the same. I didn't want to add a Tested-by tag as it's > different enough, though. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ---end quoted text---