From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, ak@linux.intel.com,
eranian@google.com, dzickus@redhat.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
jmario@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] perf,x86: De-obfuscate HSW offcore bits
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:51:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141023105658.111371548@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141023105119.173457103@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-hsw-offcore-fix-1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3471 bytes --]
Andi introduced the HSW cache events array, but used magic constants
against convention as set by all the other uarchs. Try and deobfuscate
these a bit.
This patch should not change the actual values generated; however
weird they seems.
In that patch Andi also said there were differences between the
SNB/IVB and HSW/BDW offcore tables but failed to specify which and
why.
Fixes: 86a349a28b24 ("perf/x86/intel: Add Broadwell core support")
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-@git.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ static u64 intel_pmu_event_map(int hw_ev
#define SNB_BUS_LOCKS (1ULL << 10)
#define SNB_STRM_ST (1ULL << 11)
#define SNB_OTHER (1ULL << 15)
+
#define SNB_RESP_ANY (1ULL << 16)
#define SNB_NO_SUPP (1ULL << 17)
#define SNB_LLC_HITM (1ULL << 18)
@@ -255,6 +256,7 @@ static u64 intel_pmu_event_map(int hw_ev
#define SNB_LLC_HITF (1ULL << 21)
#define SNB_LOCAL (1ULL << 22)
#define SNB_REMOTE (0xffULL << 23)
+
#define SNB_SNP_NONE (1ULL << 31)
#define SNB_SNP_NOT_NEEDED (1ULL << 32)
#define SNB_SNP_MISS (1ULL << 33)
@@ -519,6 +521,40 @@ static __initconst const u64 hsw_hw_cach
},
};
+/* HSW Request type */
+#define HSW_DMND_DATA_RD (1ULL << 0)
+#define HSW_DMND_RFO (1ULL << 1)
+#define HSW_DMND_IFETCH (1ULL << 2)
+
+#define HSW_PF_DATA_RD (1ULL << 4)
+#define HSW_PF_RFO (1ULL << 5)
+#define HSW_PF_IFETCH (1ULL << 6)
+
+#define HSW_OTHER (1ULL << 15)
+
+/* HSW Supplier info := SNB Supplier info */
+/* HSW Snoop Info := SNB Snoop Info */
+
+/*
+ * SNB_LLC_* is specified as 'reserved' in the SDM
+ * but Andi added it anyhow, suggesting HSW/BDW have it just fine
+ *
+ * XXX NHM/WSM/SNB/IVB don't have the PF/IFETCH bits set
+ */
+#define HSW_DMND_READ (HSW_DMND_DATA_RD|HSW_DMND_IFETCH| \
+ HSW_PF_DATA_RD|HSW_PF_IFETCH| \
+ SNB_LLC_DATA_RD|SNB_LLC_IFETCH)
+
+/* XXX NHM/WSM/SNB/IVB dont have the PF bits set */
+#define HSW_DMND_WRITE (HSW_DMND_RFO|HSW_PF_RFO|SNB_LLC_RFO)
+
+#define HSW_DMND_PREFETCH (0) /* XXX broken ? */
+
+#define HSW_DRAM_ANY (SNB_NO_SUPP|SNB_SNP_ANY|(0x78ULL << 23)) /* WTF */
+
+#define HSW_L3_ACCESS (0) /* XXX no supplier! */
+#define NSW_L3_MISS (HSW_DRAM_ANY|SNB_NON_DRAM)
+
static __initconst const u64 hsw_hw_cache_extra_regs
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
@@ -526,16 +562,12 @@ static __initconst const u64 hsw_hw_cach
{
[ C(LL ) ] = {
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
- /* OFFCORE_RESPONSE:ALL_DATA_RD|ALL_CODE_RD */
- [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x2d5,
- /* OFFCORE_RESPONSE:ALL_DATA_RD|ALL_CODE_RD|SUPPLIER_NONE|
- L3_MISS|ANY_SNOOP */
- [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x3fbc0202d5ull,
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = HSW_DMND_READ|HSW_L3_ACCESS,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = HSW_DMND_READ|HSW_L3_MISS,
},
[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
- [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x122, /* OFFCORE_RESPONSE:ALL_RFO */
- /* OFFCORE_RESPONSE:ALL_RFO|SUPPLIER_NONE|L3_MISS|ANY_SNOOP */
- [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x3fbc020122ull,
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = HSW_DMND_WRITE|HSW_L3_ACCESS,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = HSW_DMND_WRITE|HSW_L3_MISS,
},
[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-23 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-23 10:51 [PATCH 0/4] Attempt to cleanup the " Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-23 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-10-23 12:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf,x86: De-obfuscate " Borislav Petkov
2014-10-23 13:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-23 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf,x86: HSW offcore prefetch events Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-23 10:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf,x86: Attempt to sanitize the HSW supplier info Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-23 10:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf,x86: Introduce HSW cache numa events Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-27 12:23 ` [PATCH 0/4] Attempt to cleanup the HSW offcore bits Andi Kleen
2014-10-27 13:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-27 14:28 ` Andi Kleen
2014-10-27 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-28 21:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-29 11:00 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141023105658.111371548@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jmario@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®