From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759525AbaJaUvj (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:51:39 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:33930 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757338AbaJaUvi (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:51:38 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: xB+VfBP/D7OcaDtcGRUDNwY6SDUve4gE2T++2pAR0Bn4 1414788697 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:50:24 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Balavasu Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andreas.dilger@intel.com, oleg.drokin@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: do not initialise statics to 0 or NULL Message-ID: <20141031205024.GB20417@kroah.com> References: <20141031181808.GA7830@vasu-Inspiron-3542> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141031181808.GA7830@vasu-Inspiron-3542> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:48:08PM +0530, Balavasu wrote: > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue > Error: do not initialise statics to 0 or NULL for time > > Signed-off-by: Balavasu > --- > drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/do not instalise 0 | 10 +++++----- That line doesn't look right, does it? And why netdev and not the mailing list for the drivers/staging/ tree? And again, I need a full name. greg k-h