From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"roland@hack.frob.com" <roland@hack.frob.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ptrace: add generic SET_SYSCALL request
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:05:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141112120549.GA4042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6358312.yt5WU3kBm9@wuerfel>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:19:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2014 11:13:52 Will Deacon wrote:
> > Just do arm64. We already have the dedicated request for arch/arm/.
>
> I wonder if we should define NT_ARM64_SYSTEM_CALL to the same value
> as NT_S390_SYSTEM_CALL (0x307), or even define it as an architecture-
> independent NT_SYSTEM_CALL number with that value, so other architectures
> don't have to introduce new types when they also want to implement it.
That would be a sane thing to do, so that tools which want to get at
this information can do in an almost standardised way for architectures
implementing this method.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-12 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-07 7:47 AKASHI Takahiro
2014-11-07 9:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-07 11:55 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-07 12:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-07 12:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-11-07 12:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-07 13:11 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-07 14:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-07 16:44 ` Kees Cook
2014-11-07 23:05 ` Roland McGrath
2014-11-07 12:27 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-10 6:36 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2014-11-07 14:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-11-12 10:46 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2014-11-12 11:00 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-12 11:06 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2014-11-12 11:13 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-12 11:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-12 12:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-11-13 7:02 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2014-11-13 10:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-13 14:49 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-11-13 22:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-14 1:40 ` AKASHI Takahiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141112120549.GA4042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®