From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932646AbaKMLKA (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2014 06:10:00 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:36180 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932364AbaKMLJ5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2014 06:09:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:07:40 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Simon Horman , Joe Perches , Mark Rutland , Geert Uytterhoeven , Kuninori Morimoto , Olof Johansson , Stephen Warren , Rob Herring , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , ALSA Development Mailing List , Linux-sh list , Magnus , "grant.likely@linaro.org" Message-ID: <20141113110740.GE3815@sirena.org.uk> References: <5398AB07.4040304@wwwdotorg.org> <87sinbdk44.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <878ulzx6hr.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <20140922130026.GK3290@leverpostej> <20140922132743.GM3290@leverpostej> <87y4rfhmgl.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <1415845309.4269.6.camel@perches.com> <20141113025105.GA16652@verge.net.au> <87vbmjhj00.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uYGmg1LLWPQm165X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vbmjhj00.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> X-Cookie: Some optional equipment shown. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH][resend] of: Add vendor 2nd prefix for Asahi Kasei Corp X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --uYGmg1LLWPQm165X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 03:33:38AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > I think that what Morimoto-san wanted to say was something like this: > > I guess that removing the "ak" line from vendor-prefixes.txt would > > be sufficient to cause checkpatch to generate a warning about > > using the deprecated "ak" vendor prefix. Is that a good approach? > Yes, this is. > Thank you Simon, Sorry Joe. It'd be a bit nicer to be able to leave it there with a note saying it was legacy (if only so people don't try to add it back) but I don't mind too much. --uYGmg1LLWPQm165X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUZJD7AAoJECTWi3JdVIfQTcwH/iqbf8HyIXkT9aD8GTzeQF+E QjfY2W/KOY6HGjGPuCixw2+tvHCWg6oUzFLti0q0q3VJctk/S3nvynGcMujndTGi HsLHd7JZ/2fJkr8Ov1g5DXX8BzbklfE9uG2YzBa9blFyqI24QO16VJlVRsTigarz osaC9BPvGu96leqvXWdpwJDK+rRef27kuMKnaeb+3tqpRUMCCmmn55iaxWYIIvwz jbVXYbTBm1gdNi7Nf411YTJ3Hwe463qFemX2/XgVe32qjX7HF7mrEmBHbjGHeAWz F0j3dmSEoRsFvQm0yG5LuMoYGQtFss0dd/AyE+rokv6ykGZdl/OJRgpWvCPpjms= =ts6R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uYGmg1LLWPQm165X--