From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753520AbaKQXJI (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:09:08 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:45397 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753023AbaKQXJG (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:09:06 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:03:00 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Richard Fitzgerald Cc: Linus Walleij , Lee Jones , Alexandre Courbot , Liam Girdwood , "perex@perex.cz" , Takashi Iwai , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Charles Keepax Message-ID: <20141117150300.GG2722@sirena.org.uk> References: <20141111165227.GA24344@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20141111170432.GB25738@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20141117095801.GA25618@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ExIO7AL6tcaLjJBF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141117095801.GA25618@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> X-Cookie: Today is what happened to yesterday. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 149.254.182.38 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: arizona: Add support for CS47L24 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ExIO7AL6tcaLjJBF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 09:58:01AM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 07:41:53AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > Apart from the whitespace fix pointed out by Mark, > THe line Mark commented on isn't a whitespace error. It matches > the copyright line style used by Cirrus in other files. Are you sure you're not copying a mistake someone else introduced here or that if it is in some way deliberate it's a good idea? --ExIO7AL6tcaLjJBF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUag4kAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQAvgH/Rs0lTr63qbIiQi9VPlJctYm a2R59elTbBtg7ezzVvaR4f3Yvvm3o5JQhfeaMp3xNFa9+w63nxODLP70bK9GMy6W aSeLVdSnNdiQNvmtkkpFilB2aDk9rYkN5R0/xlaJufMTsLHC7958MTWg+epkjyMN 7Q4qOPkW4QAkbCm9HhL+WjDa5ME4frKDMxnCmERfMfhofXwE2kfrfQTux9yASgt4 9JCa15DYgNMsRBrXNzpTu1hKe9VAqK2lPcvU95bGbTtggGh+dcv+5gqpHJCg9vap dpmZrDlo35y5EYccW5FzrTwWUknQprsenevg9lovtw0MVGC8vqsEjuP58RmJlxY= =Vis4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ExIO7AL6tcaLjJBF--