From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753481AbaKQXIY (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:08:24 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:52030 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752315AbaKQXIX (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:08:23 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:08:21 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Zhihui Zhang Cc: mgorman@suse.de, oleg@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [mempolicy] remove unnecessary is_valid_nodemask() Message-Id: <20141117150821.45ac5aa8dca4b43392f563a8@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1416106197-8784-1-git-send-email-zzhsuny@gmail.com> References: <1416106197-8784-1-git-send-email-zzhsuny@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.0beta7 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 21:49:57 -0500 Zhihui Zhang wrote: > When nodes is true, nsc->mask2 has already been filtered by nsc->mask1, which has > already factored in node_states[N_MEMORY]. > Please be more specific. Where does that filtering occur?