From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753934AbaKRKEv (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2014 05:04:51 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:47978 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752917AbaKRKEs (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2014 05:04:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:04:33 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Tull Message-ID: <20141118100433.GH22111@sirena.org.uk> References: <1413559023-18293-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20141117210009.GA28122@roeck-us.net> <20141117232620.GA22111@sirena.org.uk> <546AC8A4.4030705@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFBW6CQlri5Qm8JQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <546AC8A4.4030705@roeck-us.net> X-Cookie: You look tired. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.128.185.34 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Ensure unique regulator debugfs directory names X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nFBW6CQlri5Qm8JQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:18:44PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Sorry, I have no idea how you expect me (and others) to handle situations > like this, much less with this patch. Please keep in mind that this is > a per-maintainer process, and each maintainer handles things differently. > Individual maintainers may expect me to send a ping like I did, or to > resend the patch, or they may not reply because they dislike the patch The default process is to resend the patch; I'm sure there are some people who won't like that for some reason but it's reasonably rare. > and they don't want to be bothered with a discussion. Some even go > ballistic if they get an e-mail with more than 80 columns of text. That's going to annoy essentially everyone, some people will be more vocal than others but it's just a pretty basic thin. > I can't even find out by browsing the regulator mailing list since it > appears that there is no such list. lkml. --nFBW6CQlri5Qm8JQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUaxmwAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQL8QH/22+dOnw7gGUeZwOHA6JngqG CoMcumxpI2fkIZUsDgITlhBl6ujygthyknVnYlWjvw+rNQdIuC5AGqOCRbgAfNOw 8or1Hwcevg+bsQhzOc/btWxrxUILdF9p+0ooEcmdvbZwhbgII4pEBXmgbiayURgu 6QpV7+41B3aS2L4NX0kd5v+etRLVU9LtA7VQP5YMgya/6PZ0EU9+bqK1d0ODrGsU nFX8k5vQFjbp83pOUKZnxFVNAWQ3DGqbGYcEMD78l+Lg54/t3sHxP14k3aCw41UY UweOibys+9MO01r4OdtCWK59AWiLJbhhsT+rhfa0l+h9loEmstsQmfQWanpd2xY= =pwE9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nFBW6CQlri5Qm8JQ--