mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jasowang@redhat.com
Cc: cwang@twopensource.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tun: return NET_XMIT_DROP for dropped packets
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:46:04 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141119.144604.269852847904624488.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546C0B58.5030402@redhat.com>

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:15:36 +0800

> On 11/19/2014 03:53 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> > After commit 5d097109257c03a71845729f8db6b5770c4bbedc
>>> > ("tun: only queue packets on device"), NETDEV_TX_OK was returned for
>>> > dropped packets. This will confuse pktgen since dropped packets were
>>> > counted as sent ones.
>>> >
>>> > Fixing this by returning NET_XMIT_DROP to let pktgen count it as error
>>> > packet.
>> pktgen is suspicious, it sends out packets directly without going through
>> qdisc, so it should not care about NET_XMIT_* qdisc error code?
> 
> Well, NET_XMIT_DROP has been used by some devices. I don't see any side
> effect of using this especially consider that pktgen can recognize them.
>> Looks like NETDEV_TX_OK doesn't have to mean TX is successful,
>> the comment says driver takes care of the packet, can be either dropped
>> or sent out. We might need a new code to distinguish success or failure.
> 
> Most drivers only drop bad packets when they return NETDEV_TX_OK and
> they will stop the txq before tx ring is full. This is not the case of
> tun, it never stop txq and keep accepting packets and dropping them when
> socket receive queue is full.

Agreed.

Often the issue with TX return values is lack of clear documentation
and use cases.

I've applied this patch, thanks Jason.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-19 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-18  5:20 Jason Wang
2014-11-18 16:53 ` Amos Kong
2014-11-19  3:09   ` Jason Wang
2014-11-18 19:53 ` Cong Wang
2014-11-19  3:15   ` Jason Wang
2014-11-19 19:46     ` David Miller [this message]
2014-11-19 19:53       ` Cong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141119.144604.269852847904624488.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®