From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754720AbaKSJfc (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:35:32 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:52666 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752006AbaKSJf3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:35:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:34:45 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Beniamino Galvani Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Carlo Caione , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Jerry Cao , Victor Wan Message-ID: <20141119093445.GV22111@sirena.org.uk> References: <1416264471-774-1-git-send-email-b.galvani@gmail.com> <1416264471-774-2-git-send-email-b.galvani@gmail.com> <20141118140658.GI22111@sirena.org.uk> <20141118225546.GA27182@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s0H35NU0PUc8VBh+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141118225546.GA27182@gmail.com> X-Cookie: You look tired. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 188.29.164.121 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: Add 'last' flag to spi_transfer structure X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --s0H35NU0PUc8VBh+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:55:46PM +0100, Beniamino Galvani wrote: > Would it be better to introduce something like: > static inline bool > spi_transfer_is_last(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_transfer *xfer) > { > return list_is_last(&xfer->transfer_list, &master->cur_msg->transfers); > } > or open code it in the driver? Adding the helper function seems better, it means we can change the implementation later. --s0H35NU0PUc8VBh+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUbGQxAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQe2sH/RfuVlJmbwTuMXxo8oXmtKoc BkHQLcXVYYGZL+9M7S/W/Pk2xzSqvQuWPMUWraFk39+5XHzlieHbsFkWOd/P7H5i 0yekOEWxbVkHnRzOEBJsXlUNCJbepPUA+0YPBlIMtlTi3ClCDfPjgAZTcLDgLdH4 F6DWpQgHcU6n+bnCUGBNcas1l3v8Q73QhJCtifjxnnS2aUaQ1jZPmWSc50kA8W1i n/HDZn3VFxnfCTJ+1z/vwAwf4BKC1SgI0qJezWIHLsI8yeG4LgIMqExnqpVXOTUF vW4JxSeNNtEweyIiEzqLvSFdCDrXUJfYnWoueQIRsOTpUh3mMrtWhInUdg8LFK4= =JxKc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s0H35NU0PUc8VBh+--