From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: "peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"riel@redhat.com" <riel@redhat.com>,
"efault@gmx.de" <efault@gmx.de>,
"nicolas.pitre@linaro.org" <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] sched: make scale_rt invariant with frequency
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:35:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141121123559.GF23177@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415033687-23294-6-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:54:42PM +0000, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The average running time of RT tasks is used to estimate the remaining compute
> capacity for CFS tasks. This remaining capacity is the original capacity scaled
> down by a factor (aka scale_rt_capacity). This estimation of available capacity
> must also be invariant with frequency scaling.
>
> A frequency scaling factor is applied on the running time of the RT tasks for
> computing scale_rt_capacity.
>
> In sched_rt_avg_update, we scale the RT execution time like below:
> rq->rt_avg += rt_delta * arch_scale_freq_capacity() >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT
>
> Then, scale_rt_capacity can be summarized by:
> scale_rt_capacity = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE -
> ((rq->rt_avg << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT) / period)
>
> We can optimize by removing right and left shift in the computation of rq->rt_avg
> and scale_rt_capacity
>
> The call to arch_scale_frequency_capacity in the rt scheduling path might be
> a concern for RT folks because I'm not sure whether we can rely on
> arch_scale_freq_capacity to be short and efficient ?
It better be fast :) It is used in critical paths. However, if you
really care about latency you probably don't want frequency scaling to
mess around. If the architecture provides a fast-path for
arch_scale_freq_capacity() returning SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE when frequency
scaling is disabled, the overhead should be minimal. If the architecture
doesn't provide arch_scale_freq_capacity() it becomes a constant
multiplication and should hopefully go away completely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 17 +++++------------
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index a5039da..b37c27b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5785,7 +5785,7 @@ unsigned long __weak arch_scale_cpu_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> static unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(int cpu)
> {
> struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> - u64 total, available, age_stamp, avg;
> + u64 total, used, age_stamp, avg;
> s64 delta;
>
> /*
> @@ -5801,19 +5801,12 @@ static unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(int cpu)
>
> total = sched_avg_period() + delta;
>
> - if (unlikely(total < avg)) {
> - /* Ensures that capacity won't end up being negative */
> - available = 0;
> - } else {
> - available = total - avg;
> - }
> + used = div_u64(avg, total);
I haven't looked through all the details of the rt avg tracking, but if
'used' is in the range [0..SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE], I believe it should
work. Is it guaranteed that total > 0 so we don't get division by zero?
It does get a slightly more complicated if we want to figure out the
available capacity at the current frequency (current < max) later. Say,
rt eats 25% of the compute capacity, but the current frequency is only
50%. In that case get:
curr_avail_capacity = (arch_scale_cpu_capacity() *
(arch_scale_freq_capacity() - (SCHED_SCALE_CAPACITY - scale_rt_capacity())))
>> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT
With numbers assuming arch_scale_cpu_capacity() = 800:
curr_avail_capacity = 800 * (512 - (1024 - 758)) >> 10 = 200
Which isn't actually that bad. Anyway, it isn't needed until we start
invovling energy models.
>
> - if (unlikely((s64)total < SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE))
> - total = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> + if (likely(used < SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE))
> + return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE - used;
>
> - total >>= SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
> -
> - return div_u64(available, total);
> + return 1;
> }
>
> static void update_cpu_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index c34bd11..fc5b152 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1312,9 +1312,11 @@ static inline int hrtick_enabled(struct rq *rq)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> extern void sched_avg_update(struct rq *rq);
> +extern unsigned long arch_scale_freq_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu);
I'm not sure if it makes any difference, but shouldn't it be __weak
instead of extern?
unsigned long __weak arch_scale_freq_capacity(...)
Also, now that the function prototype definition is in the header file
we can kill the local prototype in fair.c introduced in patch 4:
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6fd5ac6..921b174 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2277,8 +2277,6 @@ static u32 __compute_runnable_contrib(u64 n)
return contrib + runnable_avg_yN_sum[n];
}
-unsigned long __weak arch_scale_freq_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd,
int cpu);
-
/*
* We can represent the historical contribution to runnable average as
* the
* coefficients of a geometric series. To do this we sub-divide our
* runnable
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-21 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-03 16:54 [PATCH v9 00/10] sched: consolidation of CPU capacity and usage Vincent Guittot
2014-11-03 16:54 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] sched: add utilization_avg_contrib Vincent Guittot
2014-11-21 12:34 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-24 14:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-24 17:34 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-03 16:54 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] sched: Track group sched_entity usage contributions Vincent Guittot
2014-11-21 12:35 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-24 14:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-24 15:39 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-03 16:54 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] sched: remove frequency scaling from cpu_capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-11-21 12:35 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-03 16:54 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] sched: Make sched entity usage tracking scale-invariant Vincent Guittot
2014-11-21 12:35 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-26 16:05 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-11-03 16:54 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] sched: make scale_rt invariant with frequency Vincent Guittot
2014-11-21 12:35 ` Morten Rasmussen [this message]
2014-11-24 14:24 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-24 17:05 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-25 13:48 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-26 11:57 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-25 2:24 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-25 13:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-26 5:18 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-26 8:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-03 16:54 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] sched: add per rq cpu_capacity_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-11-03 16:54 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] sched: get CPU's usage statistic Vincent Guittot
2014-11-21 12:36 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-03 16:54 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] sched: replace capacity_factor by usage Vincent Guittot
2014-11-19 15:15 ` pang.xunlei
2014-11-19 17:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-21 12:37 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-24 14:41 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-24 17:16 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-03 16:54 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] sched: add SD_PREFER_SIBLING for SMT level Vincent Guittot
2014-11-03 16:54 ` [PATCH v9 10/10] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-11-21 12:37 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-24 14:45 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-24 17:30 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-11-21 12:34 ` [PATCH v9 00/10] sched: consolidation of CPU capacity and usage Morten Rasmussen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141121123559.GF23177@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®