From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ftrace/x86: Add frames pointers to trampoline as necessary
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:05:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141122080515.1fbd62ef@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFx3AZpdU2YxFrNXvhWqJ2PyhyQBqTi7v_9hGH1UV-aY4g@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:35:10 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > +.macro create_frame parent rip
> > +#ifdef CC_USING_FENTRY
> > + pushq \parent
> > + pushq %rbp
> > + movq %rsp, %rbp
>
> This is a very strange frame.
>
> Why do you do the "pushq \parent" at all? Why isn't this just a *real*
> frame and add it to MCOUNT_SAVE_FRAME.
>
> You seem to create this fake frame-within-a-frame thing. It's not clear why.
>
Honestly, I did it this way because it was the simplest way to do it.
There's three different setups this covers:
1) frame pointers and mcount
2) frame pointers and fentry
3) no frame pointers and fentry
(mcount forces frame pointers, so there's no "no frame pointers and
mcount)
You probably know all this but I'm writing this for anyone else that
might be reading this. And also let you know what I understand, which
might be wrong too ;-)
With #3 we don't need to do anything. But when frame pointers
are enabled, we have in the main code:
1) mcount
func:
push %rbp
mov %rsp %rbp
[...]
call mcount
2) fentry
func:
call fentry
push %rbp
mov %rsp %rbp
On mcount, the frame pointer of the parent is pushed to the stack, with
fentry it is not.
Now when fentry is called, the stack is:
address of return-to-parent-addr
address of return-to-func-addr
If fentry does just:
fentry:
push %rbp
mov %rsp %rbp
Then the stack trace will see after %rbp the return to func, but it
will never see the return to parent, and the parent will be missing
from the stack trace.
At a minimum, fentry needs:
fentry:
push 8(%rsp) // Return to parent, not func
push %rbp
mov %rsp %rbp
push 16(%rbp) // Return to func:
push %rbp
mov %rsp %rbp
With mcount, the call is done after the parent frame pointer is setup,
so we only really need to
mcount:
push %rbp
mov %rsp %rbp
My version adds an extra push %rip in the mcount case but is the same
in the fentry case which is now the default.
The ftrace_caller_setup took a little bit to get right. I'm nervous
about modifying that and breaking something. Better yet, after that is
called, the parent rip is placed in %rsi and the func rip is placed in
%rdi. By doing it the way I did it, it made it nice and convenient that
I could just make a couple of macros that handle all three cases.
If you want, I can add more comments to explain all this.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-22 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-21 14:50 Steven Rostedt
2014-11-22 1:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-22 13:05 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-11-23 22:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 1:16 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141122080515.1fbd62ef@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®