mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [4/5] i2c: davinci: use bus recovery infrastructure
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:07:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141124200754.GW4431@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547331F2.3000006@ti.com>

Hi Grygorii,

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 03:26:10PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 11/23/2014 10:36 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 09:33:22PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >> On 11/21/2014 09:07 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:03:07PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >>> Just another general comment about the driver that doesn't influence the
> >>> correctness of this patch: The i2c-davinci driver is quite quick to
> >>> reset the bus. I wonder how often this reset triggers. Is the bus in
> >>> question less "stable" than others?
> >>
> >> In comparison to ..? :)
> > In comparison to other bus drivers in other SoCs. I know this might be
> > hard to answer. I just wonder where the reason for this has to be
> > located. Strange hardware? Software bug? Or is this SoC just operating
> > with strange slaves more often than others?
> 
> Davinci driver does reset in two cases:
> - when I2C transaction isn't completed due to timeout (no irq received)
> - when BB is detected
> both cases are reasonable, because in 1st case HW state is undefined
> in 2d case - Davinci I2C supports only master mode and if BB detected
> we need perform some recovery procedure.
note that for multi-master scenarios bus recovery might be bad. So that
has not necessarily something to do with "master mode only".

> Also, this patch doesn't introduce functional changes - it's just code
> reworking intended to reuse I2C bus recovery infrastructure
Yeah this is fine, and my concern shouldn't stop your patch from getting
in as it is an improvement for sure. Still I only had to handle BB once
in my linux lifetime, and that was for a different reason. (Machine
doing massive i2c transfers and so a client was often holding the bus
busy when the watchdog resetted the cpu.) So I just wondered how often
the need for recovery arises.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-24 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-20 10:03 [PATCH 0/5] i2c: davinci improvements and fixes Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-20 10:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] i2c: i2c-davinci: switch to use platform_get_irq Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-20 21:48   ` [1/5] " Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-21 11:01     ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-21 14:03       ` Rob Herring
2014-11-21 14:59         ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-20 10:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] i2c: davinci: query STP always when NACK is received Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-20 22:19   ` [2/5] " Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-21 12:48     ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-21 13:10       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-21 15:33         ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-23 20:33           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-24 13:34             ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-24 20:02               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-20 10:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] i2c: recovery: change input parameter to i2c_adapter for prepare/unprepare_recovery Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-21 18:49   ` [3/5] " Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-20 10:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] i2c: davinci: use bus recovery infrastructure Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-21 19:07   ` [4/5] " Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-21 19:33     ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-23 20:36       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-24 13:26         ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-24 20:07           ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2014-11-20 10:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] i2c: davinci: use ICPFUNC to toggle I2C as gpio for bus recovery Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-23 17:04   ` [5/5] " Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-24 13:15     ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-24 18:13       ` Mike Looijmans
2014-11-24 19:22         ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-24 19:45       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-25 13:04         ` Grygorii Strashko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141124200754.GW4431@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome