From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752481AbaKZLTd (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:19:33 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:39222 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752288AbaKZLTb (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:19:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:17:16 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Darren Hart Cc: Grant Likely , Ben Zhang , alsa-devel , Liam Girdwood , Bard Liao , Oder Chiou , Anatol Pomozov , Dylan Reid , flove@realtek.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Message-ID: <20141126111716.GE7712@sirena.org.uk> References: <1416034608-24238-1-git-send-email-benzh@chromium.org> <5474A78C.7030805@linux.intel.com> <20141125172120.GI7712@sirena.org.uk> <5474CB5D.9050807@linux.intel.com> <20141125184304.GK7712@sirena.org.uk> <54753168.9010303@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4mL5lf+nIvB09VHj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54753168.9010303@linux.intel.com> X-Cookie: Celebrity voices impersonated. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: rt5677: Add ACPI device probing X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --4mL5lf+nIvB09VHj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 05:48:24PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > On 11/25/14 10:43, Mark Brown wrote: > > Link from where - do we want to talk to the ACPI/UEFI forum and > > figure out some kind of fast track process for them to add an "it's > > already covered by DT, see here" entry to their database for > > example? We also ought to work out how to make sure ACPI IDs are > > registered there as well, should be possible to have something > > simple as part of that. > As to registering ACPI IDs, I believe this is the right link: > http://www.uefi.org/PNP_ACPI_Registry No, those are vendors as far as I can tell. I mean identifiers for specific devices - it appears to be common for for example Intel to allocate identifiers for devices they don't produce, I'd expect there to be some effort to keep track of that especially given that _DSD properties may well end up being specific to the identifier used to register in cases of parallel evolution. > Or did you mean a HID/CID<->DSD mapping? I don't really know what that is, sorry. --4mL5lf+nIvB09VHj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUdba7AAoJECTWi3JdVIfQl+EH/05OwjjXJShHKp/BUtfOENKZ 8YftwVKN6JcxV8bMCirUrmW8SUU7e30SczJCNO1M/6d+eIStGINKidD0WH8xsN/t frPLB51T2BLbZi66hp4H/SQPUzi1HLK+RvBD1+SnObY04vn0vbQBUgkerBs2zU4G c3E/uMcjG2ZuMb7bVphC7nnuHs3edz99gyAEGZW9ZCz0uvPqS3BUm7UTIXb5UsVF fQkOzIZeioRRjw81dSzFV3ruJFMxbxe0Sb5BfoobuGDRBl9ZM32QwzSIZl3pyVdh KuJTar+zYpgT5sdZWcY+7088uE1aGvHl0Cn+7B0LnrponBT958EibrEqeg3w9cA= =13eO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4mL5lf+nIvB09VHj--