From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754149AbaKZXNd (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2014 18:13:33 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.232]:61336 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751634AbaKZXNa (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2014 18:13:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 18:13:28 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , "H. Peter Anvin" , Masami Hiramatsu Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9 v2] ftrace/x86: Clean up of mcount.S code Message-ID: <20141126181328.6f517d65@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20141125115003.856641273@goodmis.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 23:05:48 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) (9): > > ftrace/x86: Have static tracing also use ftrace_caller_setup > > ftrace/x86: Move MCOUNT_SAVE_FRAME out of header file > > ftrace/x86: Rename MCOUNT_SAVE_FRAME and add more detailed comments > > ftrace/x86: Have save_mcount_regs store RIP in %rdi for first parameter > > ftrace/x86: Simplify save_mcount_regs on getting RIP > > ftrace/x86: Add macro MCOUNT_REG_SIZE for amount of stack used to save mcount regs > > ftrace/x86: Have save_mcount_regs macro also save stack frames if needed > > ftrace/x86: Get rid of ftrace_caller_setup > > ftrace/fgraph/x86: Have prepare_ftrace_return() take ip as first parameter > > I took the last remaining cells of my review damaged brain together to > go through this with a fine comb. So far I could not find something, > but I might have missed the obvious. > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Thanks! -- Steve