mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Lukasz Pawelczyk <l.pawelczyk@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Pawelczyk <havner@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>,
	Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/exit.c: make sure current's nsproxy != NULL while checking caps
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:52:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141126205230.GA22121@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417011661-19230-1-git-send-email-l.pawelczyk@samsung.com>

On 11/26, Lukasz Pawelczyk wrote:
>
> My understanding is that while we have to use task_nsproxy()

task_nsproxy() has already gone... probably this doesn't matter but which
kernel version ?

> task's nsproxy and check whether it's NULL, for the 'current' we don't
> have to and it's expected not to be NULL.

Well, unless exit_task_namespaces() was called ;)

> There seem to be no crash currently because of this, but with other LSM
> modules or in future there might be. This is the backtrace:

Confused... backtrace of what? did kernel crash or what?

> 0  smk_tskacc (task=0xffff88003b0b92e0, obj_known=0x2 <irq_stack_union+2>, mode=2, a=0xffff88003be53dd8) at security/smack/smack_access.c:261
> 1  0xffffffff8130e2aa in smk_curacc (obj_known=<optimized out>, mode=<optimized out>, a=<optimized out>) at security/smack/smack_access.c:318
> 2  0xffffffff8130a50d in smack_task_kill (p=0xffff88003b0b92e0, info=<optimized out>, sig=<optimized out>, secid=<optimized out>) at security/smack/smack_lsm.c:2071

I do not know this code, so could you please tell more? How/wher smk_tskacc()
uses ->nsproxy?  smack_access.c:261 leads to the comment header above smk_curacc()
in my tree, so this tells me nothing.

> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -751,7 +751,6 @@ void do_exit(long code)
>  	exit_fs(tsk);
>  	if (group_dead)
>  		disassociate_ctty(1);
> -	exit_task_namespaces(tsk);
>  	exit_task_work(tsk);
>  	exit_thread();
>  
> @@ -773,6 +772,13 @@ void do_exit(long code)
>  	flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(tsk);
>  
>  	exit_notify(tsk, group_dead);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * This should be after all things that pottentially require
> +	 * process's namespaces (e.g. capability checks).
> +	 */
> +	exit_task_namespaces(tsk);
> +
>  	proc_exit_connector(tsk);

Well, we can probably move exit_task_namespaces() down (perhaps we even
want to move it after exit_task_work).

But I am not sure about exit_notify(), in this case free_nsproxy() can
be called when the caller is already reaped.

In any case, please more details?

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-26 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-26 14:21 Lukasz Pawelczyk
2014-11-26 20:52 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-11-27 10:55   ` Lukasz Pawelczyk
2014-11-26 21:32 ` David Rientjes
2014-11-27 11:01   ` Lukasz Pawelczyk
2014-12-01 21:08     ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141126205230.GA22121@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=guillaume@morinfr.org \
    --cc=havner@gmail.com \
    --cc=l.pawelczyk@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=snanda@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®