From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751976AbaK3FAQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Nov 2014 00:00:16 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:54880 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750720AbaK3FAO (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Nov 2014 00:00:14 -0500 Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 21:04:22 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20141129.210422.2298555198780052887.davem@davemloft.net> To: jasowang@redhat.com Cc: mst@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] vhost: remove unnecessary forward declarations in vhost.h From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1417070481-10331-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> References: <1417070481-10331-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.4 on Emacs 23.4 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.7 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Sat, 29 Nov 2014 21:00:13 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jason Wang Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:41:21 +0800 > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang I don't think generic vhost patches should go via my tree. If you disagree, let me know why, thanks :)