From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754175AbaLAWjQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 17:39:16 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51845 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754026AbaLAWjO (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 17:39:14 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:39:13 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Aaron Tomlin , Pavel Emelyanov , Serge Hallyn , Sterling Alexander , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] exit: pidns: fix/update the comments in zap_pid_ns_processes() Message-Id: <20141201143913.8780d386f9ad3ef87aeadd17@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20141126235437.GA386@redhat.com> References: <20141126235416.GA32688@redhat.com> <20141126235437.GA386@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.0beta7 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:54:37 +0100 Oleg Nesterov wrote: > The comments in zap_pid_ns_processes() are not clear, we need to > explain how this code actually works. Could we please get some documentation for PIDNS_HASH_ADDING? What it does, what is the protocol for handling it, etc? I was trying to review your [1/2] but this little mystery has me somewhat stumped.