From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] srcu: Isolate srcu sections using CONFIG_SRCU
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:10:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141208181013.GA14664@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418054134-28746-1-git-send-email-bobby.prani@gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:55:34AM -0500, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Isolate the SRCU functions and data structures within CONFIG_SRCU so that there
> is a compile time failure if srcu is used when not enabled. This was decided to
> be better than waiting until link time for a failure to occur.
Queued, but the 0day test robot complained, so I dropped it. Looking
forward to an updated version. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
> CC: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> CC: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> CC: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> include/linux/notifier.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> include/linux/srcu.h | 6 +++++-
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/notifier.h b/include/linux/notifier.h
> index d14a4c3..291ecb1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/notifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/notifier.h
> @@ -70,12 +70,6 @@ struct raw_notifier_head {
> struct notifier_block __rcu *head;
> };
>
> -struct srcu_notifier_head {
> - struct mutex mutex;
> - struct srcu_struct srcu;
> - struct notifier_block __rcu *head;
> -};
> -
> #define ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name) do { \
> spin_lock_init(&(name)->lock); \
> (name)->head = NULL; \
> @@ -88,11 +82,6 @@ struct srcu_notifier_head {
> (name)->head = NULL; \
> } while (0)
>
> -/* srcu_notifier_heads must be initialized and cleaned up dynamically */
> -extern void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh);
> -#define srcu_cleanup_notifier_head(name) \
> - cleanup_srcu_struct(&(name)->srcu);
> -
> #define ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_INIT(name) { \
> .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.lock), \
> .head = NULL }
> @@ -101,7 +90,6 @@ extern void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh);
> .head = NULL }
> #define RAW_NOTIFIER_INIT(name) { \
> .head = NULL }
> -/* srcu_notifier_heads cannot be initialized statically */
>
> #define ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name) \
> struct atomic_notifier_head name = \
> @@ -121,8 +109,6 @@ extern int blocking_notifier_chain_register(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh,
> struct notifier_block *nb);
> extern int raw_notifier_chain_register(struct raw_notifier_head *nh,
> struct notifier_block *nb);
> -extern int srcu_notifier_chain_register(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh,
> - struct notifier_block *nb);
>
> extern int blocking_notifier_chain_cond_register(
> struct blocking_notifier_head *nh,
> @@ -134,8 +120,6 @@ extern int blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh,
> struct notifier_block *nb);
> extern int raw_notifier_chain_unregister(struct raw_notifier_head *nh,
> struct notifier_block *nb);
> -extern int srcu_notifier_chain_unregister(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh,
> - struct notifier_block *nb);
>
> extern int atomic_notifier_call_chain(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh,
> unsigned long val, void *v);
> @@ -149,10 +133,6 @@ extern int raw_notifier_call_chain(struct raw_notifier_head *nh,
> unsigned long val, void *v);
> extern int __raw_notifier_call_chain(struct raw_notifier_head *nh,
> unsigned long val, void *v, int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls);
> -extern int srcu_notifier_call_chain(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh,
> - unsigned long val, void *v);
> -extern int __srcu_notifier_call_chain(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh,
> - unsigned long val, void *v, int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls);
>
> #define NOTIFY_DONE 0x0000 /* Don't care */
> #define NOTIFY_OK 0x0001 /* Suits me */
> @@ -211,5 +191,30 @@ static inline int notifier_to_errno(int ret)
>
> extern struct blocking_notifier_head reboot_notifier_list;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SRCU
> +
> +struct srcu_notifier_head {
> + struct mutex mutex;
> + struct srcu_struct srcu;
> + struct notifier_block __rcu *head;
> +};
> +
> +/* srcu_notifier_heads must be initialized and cleaned up dynamically
> + * srcu_notifier_heads cannot be initialized statically
> + */
> +extern void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh);
> +#define srcu_cleanup_notifier_head(name) cleanup_srcu_struct(&(name)->srcu)
> +
> +extern int srcu_notifier_chain_register(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh,
> + struct notifier_block *nb);
> +extern int srcu_notifier_chain_unregister(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh,
> + struct notifier_block *nb);
> +extern int srcu_notifier_call_chain(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh,
> + unsigned long val, void *v);
> +extern int __srcu_notifier_call_chain(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh,
> + unsigned long val, void *v, int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls);
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SRCU */
> +
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> #endif /* _LINUX_NOTIFIER_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
> index 9cfd962..ed9c389 100644
> --- a/include/linux/srcu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
> *
> */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SRCU
> +
> #ifndef _LINUX_SRCU_H
> #define _LINUX_SRCU_H
>
> @@ -249,4 +251,6 @@ static inline void smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock(void)
> /* __srcu_read_unlock has smp_mb() internally so nothing to do here. */
> }
>
> -#endif
> +#endif /* _LINUX_SRCU_H */
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SRCU */
> --
> 1.9.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-08 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-08 15:55 Pranith Kumar
2014-12-08 18:10 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-12-08 20:23 Pranith Kumar
2014-12-09 14:16 Pranith Kumar
2014-12-09 17:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-09 18:48 Pranith Kumar
2014-12-09 20:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-12-10 0:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-27 17:17 Pranith Kumar
2014-12-29 10:03 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-12-30 4:32 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-12-30 19:44 ` Scott Wood
2014-12-29 23:05 ` Scott Wood
2014-12-30 5:06 ` Pranith Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141208181013.GA14664@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome