From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH workqueue/for-3.18-fixes 2/2] workqueue: allow rescuer thread to do more work
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:47:35 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141209094735.0a5cfab0@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141208174052.GA12274@htj.dyndns.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2605 bytes --]
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:40:52 -0500 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:12:23AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> >
> > When there is serious memory pressure, all workers in a pool could be
> > blocked, and a new thread cannot be created because it requires memory
> > allocation.
> >
> > In this situation a WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue will wake up the
> > rescuer thread to do some work.
> >
> > The rescuer will only handle requests that are already on ->worklist.
> > If max_requests is 1, that means it will handle a single request.
> >
> > The rescuer will be woken again in 100ms to handle another max_requests
> > requests.
> >
> > I've seen a machine (running a 3.0 based "enterprise" kernel) with
> > thousands of requests queued for xfslogd, which has a max_requests of
> > 1, and is needed for retiring all 'xfs' write requests. When one of
> > the worker pools gets into this state, it progresses extremely slowly
> > and possibly never recovers (only waited an hour or two).
> >
> > With this patch we leave a pool_workqueue on mayday list
> > until it is clearly no longer in need of assistance. This allows
> > all requests to be handled in a timely fashion.
> >
> > We keep each pool_workqueue on the mayday list until
> > need_to_create_worker() is false, and no work for this workqueue is
> > found in the pool.
> >
> > I have tested this in combination with a (hackish) patch which forces
> > all work items to be handled by the rescuer thread. In that context
> > it significantly improves performance. A similar patch for a 3.0
> > kernel significantly improved performance on a heavy work load.
> >
> > Thanks to Jan Kara for some design ideas, and to Dongsu Park for
> > some comments and testing.
> >
> > tj: Inverted the lock order between wq_mayday_lock and pool->lock with
> > a preceding patch and simplified this patch. Added comment and
> > updated changelog accordingly. Dongsu spotted missing get_pwq()
> > in the simplified code.
> >
> > Cc: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
> > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>
> Too late for for-3.18-fixes. Applied the two patches to wq/for-3.19.
I've just run my synthetic test which forces most works to be handled by the
rescuer thread. With these patches it works more smoothly than without.
And importantly: it still works :-)
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-08 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-29 6:26 [PATCH/RFC] " NeilBrown
2014-10-29 14:32 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-29 23:19 ` NeilBrown
2014-11-04 14:22 ` Tejun Heo
2014-11-06 16:58 ` Dongsu Park
2014-11-07 3:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-11-10 5:28 ` NeilBrown
2014-11-10 8:52 ` Jan Kara
2014-11-10 22:04 ` NeilBrown
2014-11-14 17:21 ` Tejun Heo
2014-11-18 4:27 ` [PATCH - v3?] " NeilBrown
2014-11-18 6:01 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-11-18 6:11 ` NeilBrown
2014-12-02 20:43 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-03 0:40 ` NeilBrown
2014-12-03 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-03 18:02 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-03 22:31 ` Dongsu Park
2014-12-04 1:19 ` NeilBrown
2014-12-04 1:01 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-04 14:57 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-04 15:11 ` [PATCH workqueue/for-3.18-fixes 1/2] workqueue: invert the order between pool->lock and wq_mayday_lock Tejun Heo
2014-12-04 15:12 ` [PATCH workqueue/for-3.18-fixes 2/2] workqueue: allow rescuer thread to do more work Tejun Heo
2014-12-08 17:40 ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-08 22:47 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-12-05 2:09 ` [PATCH workqueue/for-3.18-fixes 1/2] workqueue: invert the order between pool->lock and wq_mayday_lock Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141209094735.0a5cfab0@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=dongsu.park@profitbricks.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome