From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Alexandru Stan <amstan@chromium.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] regulator: core: Support trying to get close to a certain voltage
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:13:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141216131324.GS11764@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=UfKAduhzs5-EJFZDgv-kv=rzMzuzT5N97ogdno66PqYw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1138 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 02:11:02PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Perhaps doing something based on the various factorings out of the
> > voltage mapping would do the trick, add a new op for getting to the
> > closest voltage?
> I'd really rather add a new op because I think it would mean that all
> the old regulators that don't implement the op would be slow all of a
> sudden. :(
Assuming there's a not missing there... I don't think it's quite that
bad, most regulators do use one of the standard mapping functions and
for those that are likely to matter for performance there's usually a
calculation rather than a lookup table. That said...
> I looked at trying to refactor everything, but I think the answer is
> that I should drop my patch and consider the existing
> regulator_set_voltage_tol() experience good enough. While I could go
> through and try to make regulator_set_voltage_tol() better:
...I do agree that the current situation is probably adequate though,
the optimisation would be nice but it's mainly going to benefit corner
cases.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-16 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-10 20:58 Doug Anderson
2014-12-10 20:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] mmc: core: Add mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc() Doug Anderson
2014-12-10 20:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] mmc: dw_mmc: Use mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc in start_signal_voltage_switch Doug Anderson
2014-12-10 20:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARK: dts: Specify VMMC and VQMMC on rk3288-evb Doug Anderson
2014-12-10 23:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] regulator: core: Support trying to get close to a certain voltage Mark Brown
2014-12-11 1:08 ` Alexandru Stan
2014-12-11 12:31 ` Mark Brown
2014-12-11 16:09 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-11 17:09 ` Mark Brown
2014-12-11 19:55 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-12 0:24 ` Mark Brown
2014-12-12 3:31 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-12 12:59 ` Mark Brown
2014-12-15 22:11 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-16 13:13 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141216131324.GS11764@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=amstan@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \
--cc=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®