From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752028AbaL3JcP (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2014 04:32:15 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:55690 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751495AbaL3JcN (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2014 04:32:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:32:10 -0800 From: "hch@infradead.org" To: KY Srinivasan Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , "ohering@suse.com" , "jbottomley@parallels.com" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Fix miscellaneous issues Message-ID: <20141230093210.GA6294@infradead.org> References: <1418764880-11183-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 09:07:59PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > Should I be resending these patches. I don't need a resend, I need a review for the patches. Note that for driver patches I'm also fine with a review from a co worker, as long as it's a real review not just a rubber stamp. Talking about process: for the next submission please only use "storvsc: " as the subject prefix, I had to remove "Drivers: scsi: " which doesn'd add useful information every time so far.