From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752151AbaL3LXv (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2014 06:23:51 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:55546 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752088AbaL3LXs (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2014 06:23:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:23:25 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Mika Westerberg Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , Rob Herring , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20141230112325.GH11764@sirena.org.uk> References: <1419846074-240217-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20141229160316.GO17800@sirena.org.uk> <20141230073714.GD1386@lahna.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1PQyblS8X/PkxCw+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141230073714.GD1386@lahna.fi.intel.com> X-Cookie: I don't get no respect. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi/spidev: Convert to use unified device property API X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --1PQyblS8X/PkxCw+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 09:37:14AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 04:03:16PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > Which nobody should be doing since it's already totally broken for > > something to be using this on the DT side except in the one case of the > > Rohm device which is listed there. I don't want to merge anything which > > allows the breakage we're seeing with people putting spidev in their DTs > > to be propagated into ACPI, at most we should have something that > > specifically identifies individual devices only. > It is pretty convenient for testing SPI bus and that's why I thought > it would be good to have possibility to enumerate this in similar way > than DT does but I understand your point. My intention is to break this for DT, at least make it scream loud warnings when it's used if not actually fail. --1PQyblS8X/PkxCw+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUoossAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQmcMH/3aXNTw3Dn5Uzl+BQQDa5+UU +LEp3o9PI5iGbH3LLfBTAqdT+kC7TF7kG8la93W3s1fhDODsPXgeu7+UdbzVihng 3SpHg3TQSdClOg7+liGRV1hLAdTG6BjrqgsBg/sfuwKdb5wsRXTbw4ufzejAsUW0 ED6yZM6jFmuIxXWxVcHKJ4Uyi3DAP4Mn+dyzKhBMYsH3S2zPHc0tvD5wbpPMJ6ds xC1JKjig32jLo0WytV97ko/KwM3IkiaCZlWm9AXqwpxRN6PLwtEmAAL85mhTtb4a N2QgTGLmOrtuTnVvba1ZeRUPCw1XsioQLr6IUKksAwcOAKpdp/8Inv4wjT81c2A= =sYNf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1PQyblS8X/PkxCw+--