From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751042AbbACO34 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2015 09:29:56 -0500 Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com ([65.39.178.135]:48504 "EHLO smtp1.hushmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750948AbbACO3z (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2015 09:29:55 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 2254 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 09:29:55 EST MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 14:52:20 +0100 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: PVS-Studio static analysis of v3.18.1 From: hg1skz6k3@hush.ai Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150103135220.5E4F160191@smtp.hushmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The PVS-Studio people used their static analizer on v3.18.1, and claim that they are not familiar with the kernel but have found issues, some of which may or may not be potential vulnerabilities. This article is essentially an ad, but still interesting http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0299/