From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
drjones@redhat.com, dzickus@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org,
uobergfe@redhat.com, chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, cl@linu.com,
fabf@skynet.be, atomlin@redhat.com, benzh@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: add running_clock for powerpc to prevent spurious softlockup warnings
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 14:10:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150105141013.946b5d15c5d003de8238951c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1419224764-11384-3-git-send-email-cyrilbur@gmail.com>
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 16:06:04 +1100 Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com> wrote:
> On POWER8 virtualised kernels the VTB register can be read to have a view of
> time that only increases while the guest is running. This will prevent guests
> from seeing time jump if a guest is paused for significant amounts of time.
>
> On POWER7 and below virtualised kernels stolen time is subtracted from
> sched_clock as a best effort approximation. This will not eliminate spurious
> warnings in the case of a suspended guest but may reduce the occurance in the
> case of softlockups due to host over commit.
>
> Bare metal kernels should avoid reading the VTB as KVM does not restore sane
> values when not executing. sched_clock is returned in this case.
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> @@ -621,6 +621,30 @@ unsigned long long sched_clock(void)
> return mulhdu(get_tb() - boot_tb, tb_to_ns_scale) << tb_to_ns_shift;
> }
>
> +unsigned long long running_clock(void)
Non-kvm kernels don't need this code. Is there some appropriate
"#ifdef CONFIG_foo" we can wrap this in?
> +{
> + /*
> + * Don't read the VTB as a host since KVM does not switch in host timebase
> + * into the VTB when it takes a guest off the CPU, reading the VTB would
> + * result in reading 'last switched out' guest VTB.
> + */
> +
> + if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR)) {
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
> + return mulhdu(get_vtb() - boot_tb, tb_to_ns_scale) << tb_to_ns_shift;
> +
> + /* This is a next best approximation without a VTB. */
> + return sched_clock() - cputime_to_nsecs(kcpustat_this_cpu->cpustat[CPUTIME_STEAL]);
Why is this result dependent on FW_FEATURE_LPAR? It's all generic code.
In fact the kernel/sched/clock.c default implementation of
running_clock() could use this expression. Would that be good or bad? :)
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * On a host which doesn't do any virtualisation TB *should* equal VTB so
> + * it makes no difference anyway.
> + */
> +
> + return sched_clock();
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-05 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-22 5:06 [PATCH 0/2] Quieten softlockup detector on virtualised kernels Cyril Bur
2014-12-22 5:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add another clock for use with the soft lockup watchdog Cyril Bur
2015-01-05 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2014-12-22 5:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: add running_clock for powerpc to prevent spurious softlockup warnings Cyril Bur
2015-01-05 22:10 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2015-01-06 2:44 ` Cyril Bur
2015-01-07 10:20 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2015-01-09 3:22 ` Cyril Bur
2015-01-05 16:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] Quieten softlockup detector on virtualised kernels Don Zickus
2015-01-05 23:53 ` Cyril Bur
2015-01-06 15:01 ` Don Zickus
2015-01-09 3:15 ` Cyril Bur
2015-01-09 14:56 ` Don Zickus
2015-01-05 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2015-01-06 2:43 ` Cyril Bur
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-01 2:38 Cyril Bur
2014-12-01 2:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: add running_clock for powerpc to prevent spurious softlockup warnings Cyril Bur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150105141013.946b5d15c5d003de8238951c@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
--cc=benzh@chromium.org \
--cc=chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=cl@linu.com \
--cc=cyrilbur@gmail.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=fabf@skynet.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=uobergfe@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®