From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>,
Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-scsi: Fix the race condition in virtscsi_handle_event
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 00:10:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150105221059.GB23518@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHdzE-_QmNZVhmChHmy3FgRjJ692Apw2Va-SGoTz25s0fLjbvQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 11:48:47AM -0800, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> There is a race condition in virtscsi_handle_event, when many device
> hotplug/unplug events flush in quickly.
>
> The scsi_remove_device in virtscsi_handle_transport_reset may trigger
> the BUG_ON in scsi_target_reap, because the state is altered behind it,
> probably by scsi_scan_host of another event. I'm able to reproduce it by
> repeatedly plugging and unplugging a scsi disk with the same lun number.
>
> To make is safe, the mutex added in struct virtio_scsi is held in
> virtscsi_handle_event, so that all the events are processed in a
> synchronized way. With this lock, the panic goes away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> index c52bb5d..7f194d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct virtio_scsi {
> /* CPU hotplug notifier */
> struct notifier_block nb;
>
> + /* Protect the hotplug/unplug event handling */
> + struct mutex scan_lock;
> +
> /* Protected by event_vq lock */
> bool stop_events;
>
> @@ -377,6 +380,7 @@ static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct
> *work)
> struct virtio_scsi *vscsi = event_node->vscsi;
> struct virtio_scsi_event *event = &event_node->event;
>
> + mutex_lock(&vscsi->scan_lock);
> if (event->event &
> cpu_to_virtio32(vscsi->vdev, VIRTIO_SCSI_T_EVENTS_MISSED)) {
> event->event &= ~cpu_to_virtio32(vscsi->vdev,
> @@ -397,6 +401,7 @@ static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct
> *work)
> pr_err("Unsupport virtio scsi event %x\n", event->event);
> }
> virtscsi_kick_event(vscsi, event_node);
> + mutex_unlock(&vscsi->scan_lock);
> }
>
> static void virtscsi_complete_event(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi, void *buf)
> @@ -894,6 +899,7 @@ static int virtscsi_init(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> const char **names;
> struct virtqueue **vqs;
>
> + mutex_init(&vscsi->scan_lock);
> num_vqs = vscsi->num_queues + VIRTIO_SCSI_VQ_BASE;
> vqs = kmalloc(num_vqs * sizeof(struct virtqueue *), GFP_KERNEL);
> callbacks = kmalloc(num_vqs * sizeof(vq_callback_t *), GFP_KERNEL);
> --
> 1.9.3
>
>
> Nice find.
>
> This fix does have the effect of serializing all event handling via scan_lock;
> perhaps you want to instead create a singlethreaded workqueue in virtio_scsi
> and queue handle_event there, rather than waiting on scan_lock on the system
> workqueue?
Or use the system single-threaded wq.
> Reviewed-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com>
>
> -- vs;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-05 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-05 6:04 Fam Zheng
2015-01-05 19:51 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
[not found] ` <CAHdzE-_QmNZVhmChHmy3FgRjJ692Apw2Va-SGoTz25s0fLjbvQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-05 22:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2015-01-06 3:57 ` Fam Zheng
2015-01-06 7:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150105221059.GB23518@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=venkateshs@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome