From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwlocks: clean up of qrwlock
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 20:08:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150106120811.GA5965@dhcp-16-105.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150106101311.GM29390@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 01/06/15 at 11:13am, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:25:42PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing.
> >
> > Do you have any other concerns about this small change?
>
> I just don't see any point in making the code worse for the 1 arch that
> actually uses it. If there were other archs using it and for them the
> code generation would be negatively impacted (they'd actually generate
> more core because of it) it might be worth looking at.
Hi Peter,
It's OK if you don't like it. I am just a little confused about 2
things:
1) Waiman said "- _QR_BIAS" is used to simulate the xaddr which is only
in x86. So removing it to make it be consistent with other ARCHs, why is
it not good? And you said making the code worse, could you be more
specific?
2) Previously you said this change will make it bigger, I thought you
means the cnts. Am I correct? Or you mean other thing?
Just want to understand it clearly, please point out what's wrong about
my understanding.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-06 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-16 6:00 Baoquan He
2014-12-16 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-12-16 15:36 ` Baoquan He
2014-12-17 21:16 ` Waiman Long
2015-01-06 9:25 ` Baoquan He
2015-01-06 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-06 12:08 ` Baoquan He [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150106120811.GA5965@dhcp-16-105.nay.redhat.com \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®