From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758027AbbAIP4r (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:56:47 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:53719 "EHLO mail-we0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752200AbbAIP4q (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:56:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:56:43 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Mark Langsdorf Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Joonsoo Kim , Marek Szyprowski Subject: Re: Linux 3.19-rc3 Message-ID: <20150109155643.GC7596@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <54AE7D53.2020305@redhat.com> <20150108150850.GD5658@dhcp22.suse.cz> <54AEB25E.9050205@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54AEB25E.9050205@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 08-01-15 10:37:50, Mark Langsdorf wrote: > On 01/08/2015 09:08 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >[CCing linux-mm and CMA people] > >[Full message here: > >http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/383669] > > >>[ 1054.095277] DMA: 109*64kB (UR) 53*128kB (R) 8*256kB (R) 0*512kB 0*1024kB > >>0*2048kB 1*4096kB (R) 0*8192kB 0*16384kB 1*32768kB (R) 0*65536kB = 52672kB > >>[ 1054.108621] Normal: 191*64kB (MR) 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB > >>0*2048kB 0*4096kB 0*8192kB 0*16384kB 0*32768kB 0*65536kB = 12224kB > >[...] > >>[ 1054.142545] Free swap = 6598400kB > >>[ 1054.145928] Total swap = 8388544kB > >>[ 1054.149317] 262112 pages RAM > >>[ 1054.152180] 0 pages HighMem/MovableOnly > >>[ 1054.155995] 18446744073709544361 pages reserved > >>[ 1054.160505] 8192 pages cma reserved > > > >Besides underflow in the reserved pages accounting mentioned in other > >email the free lists look strange as well. All free blocks with some memory > >are marked as reserved. I would suspect something CMA related. > > I get the same failure with CMA turned off entirely. I assume that means > CMA is not the culprit. OK. Do you see all the free page blocks completely reserved without CMA as well? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs