From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758173AbbAIU4h (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2015 15:56:37 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:60611 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752675AbbAIU4f (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2015 15:56:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 20:56:26 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Rich Felker Cc: David Drysdale , "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , "Eric W. Biederman" , Andy Lutomirski , Meredydd Luff , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Thomas Gleixner , Stephen Rothwell , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Kees Cook , Arnd Bergmann , Christoph Hellwig , X86 ML , linux-arch , Linux API , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 man-pages 5/5] execveat.2: initial man page for execveat(2) Message-ID: <20150109205626.GK22149@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1416830039-21952-1-git-send-email-drysdale@google.com> <1416830039-21952-6-git-send-email-drysdale@google.com> <54AFF813.7050604@gmail.com> <20150109161302.GQ4574@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150109204815.GR4574@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150109204815.GR4574@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 03:48:15PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote: > I think this is a case that needs to be fixed, though it's hard. The > normal correct usage for fexecve is to always pass an O_CLOEXEC file > descriptor, and the caller can't really be expected to know whether > the file is a script or not. We discussed workarounds before and one > idea I proposed was having fexecve provide a "one open only" magic > symlink in /proc/self/ to pass to the interpreter. It would behave > like an O_PATH file descriptor magic symlink in /proc/self/fd, but > would automatically cease to exist on the first open (at which point > the interpreter would have a real O_RDONLY file descriptor for the > underlying file). For fsck sake, folks, if you have bloody /proc, you don't need that shite at all! Just do execve on /proc/self/fd/n, and be done with that. The sole excuse for merging that thing in the first place had been "would anybody think of children^Wsclerotic^Whardened environments where they have no /proc at all". Sheesh...