From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753327AbbAOUcx (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:32:53 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:35119 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752447AbbAOUcw (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:32:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:31:59 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Jason Cooper Cc: Catalin Marinas , Grant Likely , Will Deacon , "hanjun.guo@linaro.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "graeme.gregory@linaro.org" , Sudeep Holla , "jcm@redhat.com" , Marc Zyngier , Bjorn Helgaas , Rob Herring , Robert Richter , Randy Dunlap , Charles Garcia-Tobin , "phoenix.liyi@huawei.com" , Timur Tabi , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" , Yijing Wang , ACPI Devel Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linaro-acpi Message-ID: <20150115203159.GG3043@sirena.org.uk> References: <1421247905-3749-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20150115182346.GE2329@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20150115190220.GF3043@sirena.org.uk> <20150115200437.GF24989@titan.lakedaemon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pVF9EYSGkiif4dMH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150115200437.GF24989@titan.lakedaemon.net> X-Cookie: To program is to be. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --pVF9EYSGkiif4dMH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:04:37PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all > > being posted as part of big and apparently controversial threads with > > subject lines in the form "ARM / ACPI:" so people could be forgiven for > > just not even reading the e-mails enough to notice changes to their > > subsystems. Is it worth posting those patches separately more directly > > to the relevant maintainers? > I think it's beneficial to post the entire series as one thread, but to > change the subject line of each patch to adequately reflect the affected > subsystem. Just changing the subject lines to be more suitable would help, but given the painful thread it's probably worth going the extra step if the lack of these reviews is a causing problems - I know that even with a suitable subject line if I'm busy then I'm fairly likely to zone out something in the middle a big series that doesn't seem to be going anywhere. --pVF9EYSGkiif4dMH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUuCO/AAoJECTWi3JdVIfQgVUH/R+pj/lFK0/eUWUBKgec5yah mP4d5UlCk2r/ikA4vaq3B7pwADDjNq+6fegY8xyQw7PK3lrifqpEEO4PiPtHLQtF 3DvrIXFZjZM0TNc3RlDQfZLDD9fFNQNG18h8+SV1d1r9zKvVaNA/EMGf20fVCFzs G9Q/KI7qtzHKQ6A67WTIphyeiIiyEcmox436ktNBJRtiYhnMomUIY+s7I0D5aJ3n ZFbdIPiAwn9db3GyRh3Mo9Kx0GOMoDXuFL408iwzc83bBOqrEiLdxdKvNBtnEDb5 wwkPRmBxOLbfzjZHJQrpeYnttmFaigAOLhmXAOo/QvHAFbECuWGcHZ6QDO1PFOI= =xJ3q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pVF9EYSGkiif4dMH--