From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Antoine Ténart" <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
"Ezequiel Garcia" <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
"Boris BREZILLON" <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Lior Amsalem" <alior@marvell.com>,
"Tawfik Bayouk" <tawfik@marvell.com>,
"Nadav Haklai" <nadavh@marvell.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: mvebu: Armada 385 GP: Add regulators to the SATA port
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:34:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150116153451.GA3856@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B91FB4.5080707@free-electrons.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1621 bytes --]
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:27:00PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 16/01/2015 13:37, Mark Brown wrote:
> > regulator-always-on is a bit fuzzy for suspend, if the regulator has
> > suspend control it'll kick in - it's really about the Linux refcounting
> > while it's running. What's more concerning here is that the quick
> > sample of the regulators flagged as always on like the above that I
> > looked at in the patch don't seem to have any enable control in the DT
> > so this will have absolutely no effect.
> Actually the reg_sata[0-4] are controlled by gpio, so there is a mean
> to enable/disable them. For the reg_5v_sata[0-4] and reg_12v_sata[0-4]
> they depend on their respective reg_sata and I just propagated the
> regulator-always-on, this was maybe a mistake.
It certainly makes everything confusing if you have control related
stuff on regulators that are not directly controllable.
> >> It is probably a good idea to use regulator-boot-on and
> >> then test things this way, and if that works use
> >> regulator-boot-on.
> > No, it's unlikely that boot-on makes sense here - it's there for cases
> > where we can't read back the hardware state at power on. Generally
> > drivers should work regardless of the initial state of the regulator
> > (and modular drivers will actually break if they try to rely on boot-on
> > since we clean up unused regulators at boot).
> As pointed by Hans my concern here was be sure that during boot the disk
> are not power off. In this case which property would be accurate?
None, the core won't do anything with the regulator until the end of
init anyway.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-16 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-15 14:09 [PATCH v4 0/4] ata: libahci: Allow using a regulator for each port Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-15 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] ata: libahci: Clean-up the ahci_platform_en/disable_phys functions Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-15 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] Documentation: bindings: Add the regulator property to the sub-nodes AHCI bindings Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-15 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-15 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: mvebu: Armada 385 GP: Add regulators to the SATA port Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-16 8:17 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-16 9:27 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-16 10:10 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-16 12:37 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-16 14:27 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-16 15:34 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2015-01-16 19:13 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-16 19:44 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-16 19:12 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-16 20:25 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-17 8:48 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-17 13:14 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-17 14:28 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-18 12:35 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-18 15:29 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-18 19:28 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-16 7:58 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] ata: libahci: Allow using a regulator for each port Hans de Goede
2015-01-19 14:54 ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-19 15:05 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150116153451.GA3856@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome