From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Paul Osmialowski <p.osmialowsk@samsung.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] i2c: s3c2410: Adopt i2c-s3c2410 driver for new enhancement of i2c API
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:28:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150116162827.GC3856@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421419194-1849-3-git-send-email-p.osmialowsk@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 447 bytes --]
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:39:54PM +0100, Paul Osmialowski wrote:
> This adopts i2c-s3c2410 driver for new enhancement of i2c API that
> exposes preparation and unpreparation stages of i2c transfer.
This doesn't seem to have any dependency on the previous patch at all...
it probably does want a better commit log, probably the subject should
say what new enhancement of the API is being adopted. ("Use
prepare/unprepare transfer" for example.)
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-16 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-16 14:39 [RFC 1/3] i2c: Enhancement of i2c API to address circular lock dependency problem Paul Osmialowski
2015-01-16 14:39 ` [RFC 2/3] regmap: Use the enhancement of i2c API to address circular " Paul Osmialowski
2015-01-16 16:23 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-16 17:36 ` Paul Osmialowski
2015-01-16 18:36 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-19 9:31 ` Paul Osmialowski
2015-01-19 19:25 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-20 11:14 ` Paul Osmialowski
2015-01-27 18:12 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-16 14:39 ` [RFC 3/3] i2c: s3c2410: Adopt i2c-s3c2410 driver for new enhancement of i2c API Paul Osmialowski
2015-01-16 16:28 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2015-01-18 6:30 ` [RFC 1/3] i2c: Enhancement of i2c API to address circular lock dependency problem Tomasz Figa
2015-01-18 10:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-01-18 13:41 ` Mark Brown
2015-02-25 19:47 ` Mike Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150116162827.GC3856@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.osmialowsk@samsung.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®