From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753600AbbAUWXT (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:23:19 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37978 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751985AbbAUWXJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:23:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:23:08 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Don Zickus Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML , uobergfe@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] watchdog: internally split softlockup and hardlockup Message-Id: <20150121142308.5c88fc5a6ea51a70e64d3c9c@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20150121141552.GB116159@redhat.com> References: <1415118024-194247-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <20150121141552.GB116159@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:15:52 -0500 Don Zickus wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:20:15AM -0500, Don Zickus wrote: > > The hardlockup and softockup had always been tied together. Due to the request > > of KVM folks, they had a need to have one enabled but not the other. > > Internally rework the code to split things apart more cleanly. > > > > There is a bunch of churn here, but the end result should be code that should > > be easier to maintain and fix without knowing the internals of what is going > > on. > > > > Tested by Uli and myself. > > Hi Andrew, > > Poking again. What can I do to move this along? Should I repost? I don't actually remember seeing this, but November was soooo long ago ;) Yes please - refresh, retest, resend. Don't forget to gather up any new acked/reviewed/tested-by's.