From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932888AbbA1UTp (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:19:45 -0500 Received: from mail-bl2on0140.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.169.140]:65525 "EHLO na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932756AbbA1UTl (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:19:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:14:17 -0600 From: Kim Phillips To: Michael Ellerman CC: Andrew Morton , Joonsoo Kim , Akinobu Mita , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Rik van Riel , "Linux Memory Management List" , , LKML , Jens Axboe , Minchan Kim , Al Viro , Johannes Weiner , Sasha Levin , Joonsoo Kim , linuxppc-dev , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/mm: fix undefined reference to `.__kernel_map_pages' on FSL PPC64 Message-ID: <20150128141417.ba2e413fd8ccc8bfd65196e1@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <1422415322.32234.3.camel@ellerman.id.au> References: <20150120140200.aa7ba0eb28d95e456972e178@freescale.com> <20150120230150.GA14475@cloud> <20150120160738.edfe64806cc8b943beb1dfa0@linux-foundation.org> <20150122014550.GA21444@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <20150122144147.019eedc41f189eac44c3c4cd@freescale.com> <20150122212017.4b7032d52a6c75c06d5b4728@freescale.com> <1421987091.24984.13.camel@ellerman.id.au> <20150126132222.6477257be204a3332601ef11@freescale.com> <1422406862.32234.1.camel@ellerman.id.au> <20150127185711.ee819e4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1422415322.32234.3.camel@ellerman.id.au> Organization: Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 Authentication-Results: spf=fail (sender IP is 192.88.158.2) smtp.mailfrom=kim.phillips@freescale.com; freescale.mail.onmicrosoft.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;freescale.mail.onmicrosoft.com; dmarc=permerror action=none header.from=freescale.com; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:192.88.158.2;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(51704005)(377424004)(24454002)(19580395003)(19580405001)(77096005)(92566002)(6806004)(93886004)(86362001)(23726002)(50466002)(50986999)(76176999)(104016003)(46406003)(33646002)(2950100001)(100306002)(106466001)(36756003)(85426001)(47776003)(105606002)(62966003)(87936001)(77156002)(50226001)(46102003)(110136001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0727;H:az84smr01.freescale.net;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; X-DmarcAction-Test: None X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3005004);SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0727; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004);SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0727; X-Forefront-PRVS: 047001DADA X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0727; X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jan 2015 20:19:36.7478 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 710a03f5-10f6-4d38-9ff4-a80b81da590d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=710a03f5-10f6-4d38-9ff4-a80b81da590d;Ip=[192.88.158.2] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0301MB0727 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:22:02 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 18:57 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:33:59 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > > 2015-01-28 10:01 GMT+09:00 Michael Ellerman : > > > > On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 13:22 -0600, Kim Phillips wrote: > > > >> arch/powerpc has __kernel_map_pages implementations in mm/pgtable_32.c, and > > > > > > > > I'd be happy to take this through the powerpc tree for 3.20, but for this: > > > > > > > >> depends on: > > > >> From: Joonsoo Kim > > > >> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:28:58 +0900 > > > >> Subject: [PATCH] mm/debug_pagealloc: fix build failure on ppc and some other archs > > > > > > > > I don't have that patch in my tree. > > > > > > > > But in what way does this patch depend on that one? > > > > > > > > It looks to me like it'd be safe to take this on its own, or am I wrong? > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > These two patches are merged to Andrew's tree now. > > > > That didn't answer either of Michael's questions ;) > > > > Yes, I think they're independent. I was holding off on the powerpc sorry - my bad, they are indeed completely independent. > > one, waiting to see if it popped up in linux-next via your tree. I can > > merge both if you like? > > Right, I didn't think I'd seen it in your tree :) > > I'm happy to take this one, saves a possible merge conflict. I'm fine either way (I work on linux-next). Kim