From: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
To: Paul Clements <paul.clements@us.sios.com>
Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net"
<nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] nbd: Create helper functions for ioctls
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:54:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150130075415.GC16879@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAECXXi5P_K3SMey6=wWZd6t4TgCSFkA7r_Kg_r70=rC=99+Nzw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5125 bytes --]
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:04:28PM -0500, Paul Clements wrote:
> Markus,
>
> Comments below...
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > This patch prepares the nbd code for the nbd-root device patch. It
> > moves the ioctl code into separate functions so they can be called
> > directly. The patch creates nbd_set_total_size(), nbd_set_blksize(),
> > nbd_set_sock() and nbd_set_timeout().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/block/nbd.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> > index 0ff6ebbec252..11f7644be111 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> > @@ -596,6 +596,55 @@ static void do_nbd_request(struct request_queue *q)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Call with tx_lock held
> > + */
> > +static void nbd_set_total_size(struct block_device *bdev,
> > + struct nbd_device *nbd, size_t size)
> > +{
> > + nbd->bytesize = size;
> > + bdev->bd_inode->i_size = size;
> > + set_blocksize(bdev, nbd->blksize);
> > + set_capacity(nbd->disk, size >> 9);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Call with tx_lock held
> > + */
> > +static void nbd_set_blksize(struct block_device *bdev, struct nbd_device *nbd,
> > + size_t blksize)
> > +{
> > + u64 new_bytesize;
> > +
> > + nbd->blksize = blksize;
> > + bdev->bd_inode->i_size = nbd->bytesize;
> > + set_blocksize(bdev, nbd->blksize);
> > +
> > + new_bytesize = nbd->bytesize & ~(nbd->blksize-1);
> > + if (new_bytesize != nbd->bytesize)
> > + nbd_set_total_size(bdev, nbd, new_bytesize);
>
> could just do set_capacity here to save a few cycles, but not a big
> deal either way...
Yes, however I will rework this again because set_blocksize returns
error values. So these functions should make error handling.
>
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Call with tx_lock held
> > + */
> > +static void nbd_set_sock(struct block_device *bdev, struct nbd_device *nbd,
> > + struct socket *sock)
> > +{
> > + nbd->sock = sock;
> > + if (max_part > 0)
> > + bdev->bd_invalidated = 1;
> > + nbd->disconnect = 0; /* we're connected now */
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Call with tx_lock held
> > + */
> > +static void nbd_set_timeout(struct nbd_device *nbd, int timeout)
> > +{
> > + nbd->xmit_timeout = timeout * HZ;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int nbd_connection_start(struct block_device *bdev,
> > struct nbd_device *nbd)
> > {
> > @@ -733,33 +782,22 @@ static int __nbd_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, struct nbd_device *nbd,
> > if (nbd->sock)
> > return -EBUSY;
> > sock = sockfd_lookup(arg, &err);
> > - if (sock) {
> > - nbd->sock = sock;
> > - if (max_part > 0)
> > - bdev->bd_invalidated = 1;
> > - nbd->disconnect = 0; /* we're connected now */
> > - return 0;
> > - }
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + if (!sock)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + nbd_set_sock(bdev, nbd, sock);
>
> need a return 0 here
Yes, fixed.
>
>
> > }
> >
> > case NBD_SET_BLKSIZE:
> > - nbd->blksize = arg;
> > - nbd->bytesize &= ~(nbd->blksize-1);
> > - bdev->bd_inode->i_size = nbd->bytesize;
> > - set_blocksize(bdev, nbd->blksize);
> > - set_capacity(nbd->disk, nbd->bytesize >> 9);
> > + nbd_set_blksize(bdev, nbd, arg);
> > return 0;
> >
> > case NBD_SET_SIZE:
> > - nbd->bytesize = arg & ~(nbd->blksize-1);
> > - bdev->bd_inode->i_size = nbd->bytesize;
> > - set_blocksize(bdev, nbd->blksize);
> > - set_capacity(nbd->disk, nbd->bytesize >> 9);
> > + nbd_set_total_size(bdev, nbd, arg & ~(nbd->blksize-1));
> > return 0;
>
> Might consider deprecating this one...it's pretty useless these days,
> as it has the same function as NBD_SET_SIZE_BLOCKS, but has a smaller
> device size limit (at least on some platforms)... nbd-client does not
> use it anymore...
Yes I will consider this. I am not sure yet as it isn't much overhead to
have this additional ioctl.
Thanks,
Markus
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-30 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-13 13:44 [RFC 0/4] nbd: root device support Markus Pargmann
2015-01-13 13:44 ` [RFC 1/4] nbd: Replace kthread_create with kthread_run Markus Pargmann
2015-01-13 13:44 ` [RFC 2/4] nbd: Split 'DO_IT' into three functions Markus Pargmann
2015-01-26 16:16 ` Paul Clements
2015-01-26 16:23 ` Markus Pargmann
2015-01-13 13:44 ` [RFC 3/4] nbd: Create helper functions for ioctls Markus Pargmann
2015-01-28 21:04 ` Paul Clements
2015-01-30 7:54 ` Markus Pargmann [this message]
2015-01-13 13:44 ` [RFC 4/4] nbd: Add support for nbd as root device Markus Pargmann
2015-01-20 11:51 ` Markus Pargmann
2015-01-29 23:42 ` [Nbd] " Wouter Verhelst
2015-01-30 8:04 ` Markus Pargmann
2015-01-30 17:30 ` Wouter Verhelst
2015-01-31 12:38 ` Markus Pargmann
[not found] ` <CAECXXi5+VhBeZwZ5aosc+Oc+0bCZbJZTjzYA-QTRrJCjs2NFOw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-31 14:43 ` Andreas Klauer
2015-01-31 15:45 ` Markus Pargmann
2015-01-31 15:00 ` Markus Pargmann
2015-01-30 18:10 ` [Nbd] " H. Peter Anvin
2015-01-31 12:08 ` Markus Pargmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150130075415.GC16879@pengutronix.de \
--to=mpa@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=paul.clements@us.sios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome